Journal cover Journal topic
Biogeosciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Biogeosciences, 8, 2107-2124, 2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
04 Aug 2011
Dust deposition: iron source or sink? A case study
Y. Ye1, T. Wagener2,*, C. Völker1, C. Guieu3, and D. A. Wolf-Gladrow1 1Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
2IFM-GEOMAR, Leibniz-Institut für Meereswissenschaften, Kiel, Germany
3INSU-CNRS, UMR7093, Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche/Mer (LOV), Université Paris 06, Observatoire Océanologique de Villefranche-sur-mer, France, Villefranche-sur-mer, France
*now at: LOPB, UMR6535, CNRS Université de la Méditerranee, Marseille, France
Abstract. A significant decrease of dissolved iron (DFe) concentration has been observed after dust addition into mesocosms during the DUst experiment in a low Nutrient low chlorophyll Ecosystem (DUNE), carried out in the summer of 2008. Due to low biological productivity at the experiment site, biological consumption of iron can not explain the magnitude of DFe decrease. To understand processes regulating the observed DFe variation, we simulated the experiment using a one-dimensional model of the Fe biogeochemical cycle, coupled with a simple ecosystem model. Different size classes of particles and particle aggregation are taken into account to describe the particle dynamics. DFe concentration is regulated in the model by dissolution from dust particles and adsorption onto particle surfaces, biological uptake, and photochemical mobilisation of particulate iron.

The model reproduces the observed DFe decrease after dust addition well. This is essentially explained by particle adsorption and particle aggregation that produces a high export within the first 24 h. The estimated particle adsorption rates range between the measured adsorption rates of soluble iron and those of colloidal iron, indicating both processes controlling the DFe removal during the experiment. A dissolution timescale of 3 days is used in the model, instead of an instantaneous dissolution, underlining the importance of dissolution kinetics on the short-term impact of dust deposition on seawater DFe.

Sensitivity studies reveal that initial DFe concentration before dust addition was crucial for the net impact of dust addition on DFe during the DUNE experiment. Based on the balance between abiotic sinks and sources of DFe, a critical DFe concentration has been defined, above which dust deposition acts as a net sink of DFe, rather than a source. Taking into account the role of excess iron binding ligands and biotic processes, the critical DFe concentration might be applied to explain the short-term variability of DFe after natural dust deposition in various different ocean regions.

Citation: Ye, Y., Wagener, T., Völker, C., Guieu, C., and Wolf-Gladrow, D. A.: Dust deposition: iron source or sink? A case study, Biogeosciences, 8, 2107-2124,, 2011.
Publications Copernicus