Journal cover Journal topic
Biogeosciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
BG | Volume 16, issue 10
Biogeosciences, 16, 2115-2130, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2115-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Biogeosciences, 16, 2115-2130, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2115-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 20 May 2019

Research article | 20 May 2019

Coupled calcium and inorganic carbon uptake suggested by magnesium and sulfur incorporation in foraminiferal calcite

Incorporation of magnesium and sulfur into foraminiferal shells
Inge van Dijk1,2, Christine Barras1, Lennart Jan de Nooijer2, Aurélia Mouret1, Esmee Geerken2, Shai Oron3, and Gert-Jan Reichart2,4 Inge van Dijk et al.
  • 1LPG UMR CNRS 6112, University of Angers, UFR Sciences, 2 bd Lavoisier 49045, Angers CEDEX 01, France
  • 2NIOZ Royal Institute for Sea Research, Department of Ocean Systems (OCS), and Utrecht University, Postbus 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, the Netherlands
  • 3Charney School of Marine Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
  • 4Utrecht University, Faculty of Geosciences, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, the Netherlands
Abstract
Back to toptop

Shell chemistry of foraminiferal carbonate proves to be useful in reconstructing past ocean conditions. A new addition to the proxy toolbox is the ratio of sulfur (S) to calcium (Ca) in foraminiferal shells, reflecting the ratio of SO42- to CO32- in seawater. When comparing species, the amount of SO42- incorporated, and therefore the S∕Ca of the shell, increases with increasing magnesium (Mg) content. The uptake of SO42- in foraminiferal calcite is likely connected to carbon uptake, while the incorporation of Mg is more likely related to Ca uptake since this element substitutes for Ca in the crystal lattice. The relation between S and Mg incorporation in foraminiferal calcite therefore offers the opportunity to investigate the timing of processes involved in Ca and carbon uptake. To understand how foraminiferal S∕Ca is related to Mg∕Ca, we analyzed the concentration and within-shell distribution of S∕Ca of three benthic species with different shell chemistry: Ammonia tepida, Bulimina marginata and Amphistegina lessonii. Furthermore, we investigated the link between Mg∕Ca and S∕Ca across species and the potential influence of temperature on foraminiferal S∕Ca. We observed that S∕Ca is positively correlated with Mg∕Ca on a microscale within specimens, as well as between and within species. In contrast, when shell Mg∕Ca increases with temperature, foraminiferal S∕Ca values remain similar. We evaluate our findings in the light of previously proposed biomineralization models and abiological processes involved during calcite precipitation. Although all kinds of processes, including crystal lattice distortion and element speciation at the site of calcification, may contribute to changes in either the amount of S or Mg that is ultimately incorporated in foraminiferal calcite, these processes do not explain the covariation between Mg∕Ca and S∕Ca values within specimens and between species. We observe that groups of foraminifera with different calcification pathways, e.g., hyaline versus porcelaneous species, show characteristic values for S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca, which might be linked to a different calcium and carbon uptake mechanism in porcelaneous and hyaline foraminifera. Whereas Mg incorporation might be controlled by Ca dilution at the site of calcification due to Ca pumping, S is linked to carbonate ion concentration via proton pumping. The fact that we observe a covariation of S and Mg within specimens and between species suggests that proton pumping and Ca pumping are intrinsically coupled across multiple scales.

1 Introduction
Back to toptop

The elemental and isotopic compositions of foraminiferal calcium carbonate shells reflect seawater chemistry and are therefore widely used to reconstruct specific marine environmental conditions. Besides the potential of Mg∕Ca and δ18O to reconstruct seawater temperature, currently available proxies permit reconstruction of part of the marine inorganic carbon system (Beerling and Royer, 2011; Hönisch and Hemming, 2005). One of the most recent additions to the proxy tool box is the sulfur to calcium ratio (S∕Ca) values of foraminiferal shells. In both abiogenic and biogenic carbonates, sulfur is mainly present in the form of SO42-, where it substitutes for CO32- (Pingitore et al., 1995; Perrin et al., 2017). S∕Ca is correlated to the ratio of SO42- and CO32- in seawater in both inorganic carbonates (Fernández-Díaz et al., 2010) as well as in foraminiferal calcite (Paris et al., 2014; van Dijk et al., 2017a). However, the few calibrations of foraminifera currently available are for the species Amphistegina gibbosa and Sorites marginalis and show species-specific offsets: the amount of SO42- incorporated, and therefore the S∕Ca, increases with increasing Mg content (van Dijk et al., 2017a). Covariation of concentrations of S and Mg across species could be due to increased incorporation of SO42- over CO32- as a response to elevated crystal lattice strain, due to higher concentrations of other elements, like Mg (Mucci and Morse, 1983; Evans et al., 2015), or since the ionic radius of SO42- is larger than CO32-, it might indeed be possible that distortion of the lattice by Mg leads to substitution of CO32- by SO42-. Another explanation would be cotransport of elements to the site of calcification (van Dijk et al., 2017b) or coupling of both Mg and SO42- pathways during biomineralization. To understand species-specific effects and constrain the application of these proxy relationships, it is necessary to focus on understanding element incorporation in foraminiferal calcite during biomineralization, i.e., in this case apparent coupling of Mg and S uptake and incorporation into foraminiferal calcite. While incorporation of sulfur is likely related to carbon uptake, due to the relation between calcite S∕Ca and seawater SO42-/CO32-, foraminiferal Mg∕Ca more likely reflects processes related to Ca uptake or Mg transport. Therefore, studying the relation between these elements might provide insight into the processes involved and timing of uptake of elements during biomineralization.

Isotopic and element composition of the foraminiferal shell depends on the chemistry of the fluid at the site of calcification, which in turn depends on ambient seawater and element-specific partitioning, which in inorganic experiments is known to rely on precipitation rate (Mucci, 1987; Lorens, 1981). Foraminiferal species either create a smooth porcelaneous shell, relatively rich in magnesium (>4 wt % Mg), or perforate hyaline shells, by supposedly contrasting calcification pathways (e.g., Hemleben et al., 1986; de Nooijer et al., 2009). In perforate hyaline species, studies have shown that the site of calcification is separated from the surrounding seawater by a protective envelope. Although observations for Ammonia suggest this envelope might not be closed at the start of calcification (Nagai et al., 2018), the carbonate chemistry at the site of calcification is proposed to be controlled by the foraminifer and, for example, characterized by a high internal and low external pH (de Nooijer et al., 2009; Glas et al., 2012; Toyofuku et al., 2017), as well as the chemistry of the calcification fluid itself (Erez, 2003; Bentov and Erez, 2006; Evans et al., 2018). Controlling the physicochemical conditions at the site of calcification is necessary to overcome inhibition of calcite nucleation and growth by sulfate and magnesium ions (e.g., Zeebe and Sanyal, 2002; Fernández-Díaz et al., 2010; Reddy and Nancollas, 1976). Removal or unavailability of these ions is therefore part of several proposed biomineralization models (Bentov and Erez, 2006; Bentov et al., 2009), whereas inhibition can also be overcome by increasing the saturation state at the site of calcification without needing removal of ions that inhibit calcification (Zeebe and Sanyal, 2002; de Nooijer et al., 2009; Toyofuku et al., 2017).

Here we investigate the covariation between magnesium and sulfur content of different species of foraminifera to provide new constraints on biomineralization. At the microscale level this is done by analyzing the distribution of S and Mg within the shell wall and at the species level by comparing S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca of different species covering a wide taxonomic range, including different calcification pathways. Furthermore, we measured S∕Ca values of shells of Amphistegina lessonii grown at different temperatures to investigate the potential effect of temperature on foraminiferal element incorporation. By changing seawater temperature, incorporation of Mg in many species of foraminifera increases (for an overview of different species: Toyofuku et al., 2011) due to the empirical positive relationship between temperature and Mg∕Ca in calcite (e.g., Nürnberg et al., 1996). We investigate the sulfur and magnesium incorporation in A. lessonii as a function of temperature, as to our knowledge a temperature-Mg calibration is currently lacking for this species. All observations combined show how Mg and S are incorporated in foraminiferal calcite across multiple scales and thereby provide new insights on element uptake and transport during foraminiferal biomineralization.

2 Methods and materials
Back to toptop

2.1 Collection of foraminifera

Coral debris was collected from Burgers' Zoo in Arnhem, the Netherlands, by scuba diving. The corals from the Indo-Pacific Ocean and coral debris are rich in a wide range of tropical foraminiferal species from this region (Ernst et al., 2011). The seawater in this aquarium is maintained at near-natural conditions (salinity, temperature and carbonate chemistry). Collected sediment was transported to the Royal Netherlands Institute of Sea Research (NIOZ) and stored in aerated small aquaria at room temperature. From this stock, living specimens of Amphistegina lessonii were collected from the coral debris for the culture experiment. Viable specimens of A. lessonii, recognized by color, attachment to coral debris and pseudopodial activity, were isolated and stored per 5–10 specimens in 70 mL petri dishes with 0.2 µm filtered North Atlantic surface seawater (salinity = 35.2) with the addition of 1 mL L−1 trace metal K mix (Guillard and Ryther, 1962). Furthermore, from the foraminiferal stock, specimens of other foraminifera species with either hyaline (Heterostegina depressa – in addition to Amphistegina lessonii) or porcelaneous (Sorites orbiculus, Spiroloculina angulata, Spiroloculina communis, Quinqueloculina pseudoreticulata and Quinqueloculina sp.) shells were picked to study species-specific incorporation of sulfur and magnesium in foraminiferal calcite.

2.2 Setup of controlled temperature experiment

After asexual reproduction events of isolated specimens of A. lessonii (about one-third of the specimens reproduced), the four most numerous generations (∼40–80 specimens per reproduction event) of ∼2 chambered juveniles were incubated in duplicate with 0.2 µm filtered North Atlantic surface seawater in 70 mL tissue bottles with hydrophobic caps at three different experimental conditions, resulting in ∼15–25 incubated clones per condition. Tissue bottles containing foraminifera were placed in either one of three climate incubators, set to 21, 26 and 29 C. Using tissue bottles with hydrophobic caps minimizes the amount of evaporation compared to culturing petri dishes. Nevertheless, half of the culture medium was replaced every 3 d, during which salinity was measured. Salinity never deviated more than 0.3 units from the stock value of 35.2. The temperature within each incubator was monitored every 11 min by a temperate logger (Traceable Logger-Trac, Maxi Thermal). The average temperature for the three different conditions was 21.2±0.7, 26.3±0.3 and 29.5±0.2C (±1 SD). Shelves within each incubator were equipped with in-house designed and manufactured LED shelves (full spectrum) to provide uniform light (PAR) conditions in the incubators. The LED lights were controlled by a time controller and set to 300 PAR (300 µmol of photons m2 s−2; high light condition) for a 12 h–12 h day–night cycle.

2.3 Foraminiferal calcite chemistry

2.3.1 Cleaning methods

Groups of selected species of Burgers' Zoo stock and Amphistegina lessonii from the controlled temperature experiment were cleaned before analysis of their shell chemistry. Specimens were transferred to acid-cleaned 0.5 mL PP (Polypropylene) tubes (TreffLab). For cleaning, we followed an adapted version of the protocol by Barker et al. (2003), described in van Dijk et al. (2017b). In short, to each vial, 250 µL of freshly prepared 1 % H2O2 (buffered with 0.5 M NH4OH) was added to remove organic matter. The vials were heated for 10 min in a water bath at 95 C and placed in an ultrasonic bath (80 kHz, 50 % power, degas function) for 30 s, after which the oxidizing reagent was removed with three rinses with double deionized water. These steps (organic removal procedure by oxidation) were repeated twice. Foraminiferal samples were subsequently rinsed five times with ultrapure water and dried in a laminar flow cabinet. Specimens from Burgers' Zoo were set apart for analysis by sector field ICP-MS, while the specimens from the controlled temperature experiment as well as a small number of A. lessonii from the Burgers' Zoo stock were placed on stubs for analysis by laser ablation (Reichart et al., 2003).

2.3.2 Single chamber measurements by LA-Q-ICP-MS

Element concentrations of individual chambers of A. lessonii from the controlled temperature culture experiment as well as the Burgers' Zoo stock were measured by a laser ablation quadrupole inductively coupled mass spectrometer (LA-Q-ICP-MS), similar as has been described in a number of previous studies (van Dijk et al., 2017b; Geerken et al., 2018). In short, using an ArF Excimer laser (Existar) with deep UV 193 nm wavelength and <4 ns pulse duration (NWR193UC, New Wave Research), with a circular spot of 80 µm, a repetition rate of 6 Hz and an energy density of ∼1 J cm−2, individual chambers of foraminiferal shells were targeted. The resulting aerosol was transported from the helium environment in a dual-volume cell of ∼1 cm3 (New Wave, TV2), to a Q-ICP-MS (iCap, Thermo Scientific) on a helium flow (700 mL min−1). Before entering the torch, 400 mL min−1 Argon was added using a 10 cm smoothing device made in-house. Nitrogen was not added to the carrier gas to enable accurate measurement of 55Mn. Other monitored masses include 7Li, 23Na, 24Mg, 25Mg, 43Ca, 44Ca, 88Sr, and 137Ba, with a total cycle time of 140 ms. Calibration was performed against MACS-3, a pressed powder carbonate (synthetic calcium) standard, with 43Ca as an internal standard. NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) SRM (Standard Reference Materials) 610 and 612 glass standards were measured in triplicate at the end of each series (energy density of 5±0.1 J cm−2). We choose MACS-3 as a calibration standard, since element composition approaches the foraminiferal values closer than that of NIST 610 or 612 and therefore aids a more robust calibration, even though the MACS-3 is slightly less homogeneous (see precisions listed in Table 1). Accuracy and precision per element, per standard are reported in Table 1.

Table 1Accuracy (RSD of n measurements) and precision (% of reference value) of three standards, including the calibration standard MACS-3.

NA – not available

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

In total, 441 chambers were measured; 142 ablations on 59 specimens for a temperature of 21.2 C, 189 ablations on 63 specimens for 26.3 C and 110 ablations on 42 specimens for T=29.5C. Element concentrations were calculated by integrating individual laser-ablation profiles using an adapted version of the data reduction software SILLS (Signal Integration for Laboratory Laser Systems; Guillong et al., 2008) package for MATLAB (Geerken et al., 2018; van Dijk et al., 2017b). Profiles were selected to avoid contamination of the outer or inner part of the foraminifera (for examples of profile selection see, e.g., Dueñas-Bohórquez et al., 2011; Mewes et al., 2014; van Dijk et al., 2017c). Average element/Ca (E∕Ca) per temperature conditions were calculated after removal of outliers (based on 1.5  interquartile range). We applied a t test to assess if E∕Ca is different between temperature conditions using a bilateral test.

2.3.3 Bulk measurements by SF-ICP-MS

Grouped foraminifera from the controlled temperature experiment and the species from Burgers' Zoo stock (Amphistegina lessonii, Heterostegina depressa, Sorites orbiculus, Spiroloculina angulata, Spiroloculina communis, Quinqueloculina pseudoreticulata and Quinqueloculina sp.) were analyzed for the sulfur content in their shells. Foraminifera from the controlled temperature experiment received an additional cleaning step (following the same procedure as van Dijk et al., 2017a), since they were previously fixed on a laser ablation stub with tape. These specimens were transferred in groups of  10 individuals to 0.5 mL acid-cleaned TreffLab PCR tubes and rinsed three times with 750 µL of deionized water, during which the vials were transferred to the ultrasonic bath for 1 min (80 kHz, 50 % power, degas function). Subsequently, the samples were again placed in the ultrasonic bath for another minute after the addition of 750 µL of Suprapur methanol (Aristar). The solvent was removed and the samples were rinsed three times with ultrapure water. Vials were dried in a laminar flow cabinet.

Samples from the temperature experiment and from the Burgers' Zoo were measured on different occasions, using a slightly different analytical approach. Both groups of samples were measured on an Element-2 (Thermo scientific) sector field double-focusing inductively coupled mass spectrometer (SF-ICP-MS). For the samples of the temperature experiment, 150 µL of ultrapure 0.05 M HNO3 (PlasmaPURE) was added to each vial to dissolve all foraminiferal calcite. A 5 s pre-scan for 43Ca was performed on the SF-ICP-MS to determine the [Ca] in the dissolved foraminiferal calcite solutions and according to these results, samples were diluted to obtain a solution with 40 ppm Ca. After the cones were preconditioned over 2 h with 40 ppm pure CaCO3, the final solutions were measured again for ∼170 s per sample. Samples were injected into the ICP-MS using a microFAST MC system of Elemental Scientific (ESI) with a loop of 250 mm and a flow rate of 50 mL min−1. For the sample set of the temperature experiment, masses 23Na, 24Mg, 32S, 34S and 43Ca were analyzed in medium resolution to separate 16O16O from the 32S peaks and 18O16O from the 34S peaks.

The samples from Burgers' Zoo were dissolved in 0.5 mL 0.1 M HNO3 and diluted to 100 ppm Ca accordingly to the results of the Ca pre-scan. Elemental composition of the foraminifera was measured for a wide range of elements, including 23Na, 24Mg, 32S, 34S and 43Ca at medium resolution. In total 46 isotopes were measured during 6 min at low resolution, 4 min at medium resolution and 1 min at high resolution with a 300 mL min−1 flow rate using a peristaltic pump.

For both sets of measurements, samples were measured against six ratio calibration standards with a matching matrix, i.e., 40 ppm Ca for the temperature set and 100 ppm Ca for the Burgers' Zoo set. In addition to the foraminiferal samples, we measured several standards, including NFHS-1 (NIOZ Foraminifera House Standard; for details see Mezger et al., 2016), JCt-1 (Giant Clam, Tridacna gigas) and JCp-1 (coral, Porites sp.; Okai et al., 2002) to monitor drift and the quality of the analyses. One of the ratio calibration standards was measured after every fifth sample to monitor drift. Accuracy of Mg∕Ca is 105 % and 101 % for JCt-1 and JCp-1, respectively, with an external precision of 0.4 % for both standards. Only JCp-1 has a certified value for S∕Ca, and accuracy for our measurements is 94 % based on this standard. The external precision of S∕Ca is 1.7 % and 1.0 % for JCt-1 and JCp-1. We used a ratio calibration method (de Villiers et al., 2002) to calculate foraminiferal S∕Ca (mmol mol−1).

2.3.4 Shell wall variability by electron probe microanalysis

Specimens of various foraminiferal species (Ammonia tepida, Bulimina marginata) from a recently published culture study (Barras et al., 2018) and Amphistegina lessonii cultured in the same culture setup were prepared for electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) to investigate the intra-shell incorporation of sulfur and magnesium. These foraminifera were cultured under hypoxia (30 % oxygen saturation) in controlled stable conditions and previously studied to investigate the Mn incorporation in foraminiferal calcite (for details and culture methodology see Barras et al., 2018). Ammonia tepida and Bulimina marginata were cultured at 12 C, while specimens of Amphistegina lessonii were grown at 25 C. For the latter species, the setup was equipped with a light system with 12 h–12 h light cycle.

Specimens of each species were embedded under vacuum in resin (2020 Araldite® resin by Huntsman International LLC) using 2.5 cm epoxy plugs. Samples were polished using increasingly fine sanding paper. In the final polishing step, a diamond suspension with grains of 0.04 µm was used, resulting in exposure of a cross section of the chamber walls. After applying a carbon coating, the samples were placed in the microprobe sample holder. After selection of target areas, several small high-resolution maps (130×97 pixels) were analyzed at 12.0 kV in beam scan mode for different elements (Ca, Mn, Mg, S and Na) with a dwell time of 350 ms. In total, we analyzed 12, 8 and 9 chambers of 6, 4 and 6 specimens of Ammonia tepida, Bulimina marginata and Amphistegina lessonii, respectively, an overview of the number of maps per species and the location of the maps and transects can be found in the Supplement, Table S1 and in Figs. S1–S3.

All EPMA data were further processed using MATLAB, following similar protocols used by van Dijk et al. (2017a) and Geerken et al. (2018). In summary, pores and resin were excluded from the final maps by excluding areas where Ca levels were below a certain level (mostly around <10 000 counts). The resulting concentration (level) maps were converted to semiquantitative E∕CaEPMA by applying a calibration based on mineral standards (diopside for Ca, tephroite for Mn, forsterite for Mg, celestine for S and jadeite for Na). We choose to report these ratios as E∕CaEPMA to distinguish this data from quantitative data obtained by, e.g., LA-Q-ICP-MS and SF-ICP-MS. Mn, Mg, S and Na matrices were divided by the Ca matrix, to allow for a semiquantification of the counts to concentrations to obtain E∕CaEPMA (mmol mol−1) maps.

For all successful EPMA maps, i.e., high-quality maps without distortion or charging during measurement, several rectangular areas perpendicular to the chamber wall (Fig. 1) were selected, hereafter called transect maps. In total we created 23, 15 and 16 transect maps for A. tepida, B. marginata and A. lessonii, respectively. From these transect maps, the average Mg∕CaEPMA and S∕CaEPMA values per column over the transect are plotted, resulting in a spatial distribution profile (Fig. 1d). The average values per column are plotted, to investigate the covariation of S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca in the foraminiferal chamber wall (Fig. 1c; S∕CaEPMA versus Mg∕CaEPMA).

https://www.biogeosciences.net/16/2115/2019/bg-16-2115-2019-f01

Figure 1Example of EPMA data treatment from Amphistegina lessonii (top left specimen in Fig. S3): (a) general overview of Mg∕CaEPMA map with transect selection; (b) selection of the map from (a) to isolate a transect of Mg∕CaEPMA (top) and S∕CaEPMA (bottom); (c) average S∕CaEPMA and Mg∕CaEPMA values plotted per column with the R2 for the regression analysis; (d) average E∕CaEPMA of transect – Mg∕CaEPMA in black, S∕CaEPMA in red. Asterisks indicate the outer side of the foraminiferal shell. Color scale is “parula” provided by the software.

Download

For further analysis of peak and base values, only one transect per EPMA map is considered, to avoid overrepresentation of one chamber. The locations of these transects can be found in Fig. S1, S2 and S3 for specimens of Ammonia tepida, Bulimina marginata and Amphistegina lessonii, respectively. This resulted in 12, 8 and 9 distribution profiles from transect maps of individual chambers with for A. tepida, B. marginata and A. lessonii, respectively. For the resulting distribution profiles, we calculated and compared the average values of the maximum (high-concentration bands; E∕CaMAX) and minimum (low-concentration areas; E∕CaMIN) of the first peak, which is related to the primary organic sheet. The offset between maximum and minimum value (Δmax  min; Fig. 2) is calculated as absolute concentration difference (E/CaMAX-E/CaMIN in mmol mol−1) and expressed as a peak factor (E/CaMAX/E/CaMIN). This allows for comparison of maximum (band) and minimum (non-band) values of E∕Ca between the three species.

https://www.biogeosciences.net/16/2115/2019/bg-16-2115-2019-f02

Figure 2Illustration showing the theoretical transect map and resulting distribution profile with an area of selection for peak–base analysis.

Download

3 Results
Back to toptop

3.1S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca of Amphistegina lessonii from controlled temperature conditions

S∕Ca of A. lessonii cultured at 21.2–29.5 C is on average 1.48 mmol mol−1, with no trend with increasing temperature. Mg∕Ca increases with temperature, and LA and SF-ICP-MS measurements are in good agreement. Based on the SF-ICP-MS data Mg∕Ca are on average 19.7 mmol mol−1 for 21.2 C, 25.5 mmol mol−1 for 26.3 C and 34.8 mmol mol−1 for 29.5 C (Fig. 3). Due to the number of datapoints, the relationship can be described with both a linear regression (Mg/CaCALCITE=1.83T-20.5, R2=0.88) or an exponential regression (Mg/CaCALCITE=4.4767e0.0683T, R2=0.92). For LA-ICP-MS (Fig. S4 and Table S2) average values of Mg∕Ca are 20.5±5.7 mmol mol−1 for 21.2 C, 24.9±4.4 for 26.3 C and 35.4±8.1 mmol mol−1 for 29.5 C, which is 97.2, 102.4 and 98.4 % compared to the SF-ICP-MS data. Thus, Mg∕Ca increases by 1.8 mmol mol−1 per C in our studied temperature range. Element to calcium ratio of other elements, Na∕Ca, Sr∕Ca and Mn∕Ca, are presented in the Supplement (Fig. S1 and Table S2).

https://www.biogeosciences.net/16/2115/2019/bg-16-2115-2019-f03

Figure 3Mg∕Ca (a) and S∕Ca (b) of A. lessonii from the controlled temperature experiment. Sector field ICP-MS measurements (grey symbols) and average values ± SD (black symbols) of grouped specimens. Horizontal error bars represent ± SD of temperature conditions. n is number of groups measured.

Download

3.2S∕Ca of foraminiferal species from an Indo-Pacific aquarium

Average values of S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca per species collected from the Burgers' Zoo aquarium, including values of A. lessonii from the controlled temperature experiment, are presented in Fig. 4 and Table S3. For porcelaneous species, Mg∕Ca and S∕Ca are on average 148.9±14.9 and 9.4±1.2 mmol mol−1, respectively, while hyaline species cover broader ranges, with Mg∕Ca from 36.8–153.3 mmol mol−1 and S∕Ca between 2.2 and 8.4 mmol mol−1.

https://www.biogeosciences.net/16/2115/2019/bg-16-2115-2019-f04

Figure 4Compilation of S∕Ca versus Mg∕Ca of foraminifera from the aquarium in Burgers' Zoo (circles are hyaline species; diamonds are porcelaneous species). Average values of the foraminifera from the temperature-controlled experiment are given in black, with maximum and minimum ranges. Numbers indicate species.

Download

3.3 Intra-shell distribution of sulfur and magnesium

All three species studied here, A. tepida, B. marginata and A. lessonii, show alternating bands with high and low concentrations of Mg and S, but the absolute values of these minimum and maximum values differ between species (Fig. 5). For all three species we observe a positive correlation between Mg∕CaEPMA and S∕CaEPMA profiles of different transects (example in Fig. 1c). For all transect maps, the average S∕CaEPMA and Mg∕CaEPMA is calculated and average S∕CaEPMA and Mg∕CaEPMA are, respectively, 1.7±0.1 and 3.9±0.2 mmol mol−1 for A. tepida, 1.8±0.2 and 5.5±0.4 mmol mol−1 for B. marginata and 2.4±0.3 and 23.9±2.3 mmol mol−1 for A. lessonii. The values for S∕CaEPMA versus Mg∕CaEPMA of each transect map are plotted in Fig. 6, and this figure includes all transects studied, which is between one and three transects per chamber (for locations see Figs. S1–S3).

https://www.biogeosciences.net/16/2115/2019/bg-16-2115-2019-f05

Figure 5Typical distribution of Mg∕Ca (a, b, c) and S∕Ca (d, e, f) in three species of foraminifera, Ammonia tepida (a, d), Bulimina marginata (b, e) and Amphistegina lessonii (c, f). Chamber numbers are indicated in white on the interior part of the shell.

Download

For all three studied species, values of average S∕CaEPMA and Mg∕CaEPMA of individual transects are significantly positively related for the three species, assuming a linear regression. The relationship can be described as S/CaEPMA=0.38Mg/CaEPMA+0.28 for Ammonia tepida (R2=0.47; p<0.0005), S/CaEPMA=0.43Mg/CaEPMA-0.18 for Bulimina marginata (R2=0.82; p<0.0005) and S/CaEPMA=0.089Mg/CaEPMA+0.26 for Amphistegina lessonii (R2=0.42; p<0.0025). Based on the slopes of the regressions, S∕CaEPMA increases, with ∼38 %–43 % for A. tepida and B. marginata, respectively, and ∼9 % for A. lessonii relative to Mg∕CaEPMA, from now on referred to as “S∕Ca-Mg∕Ca slope”. Amphistegina lessonii has the highest S incorporation but the least sensitive S∕Ca-Mg∕Ca slope (Fig. 6).

https://www.biogeosciences.net/16/2115/2019/bg-16-2115-2019-f06

Figure 6S∕CaEPMA versus Mg∕CaEPMA values ± SE of the EPMA transect maps of different species. Every symbol represents the average S∕CaEPMA and Mg∕CaEPMA of a single transect map, which are positively correlated for Ammonia tepida (n=24; S/CaEPMA=0.38Mg/CaEPMA+0.28 with R2=0.47; p<0.0005), Bulimina marginata (n=16; S/CaEPMA=0.43Mg/CaEPMA-0.18 with R2=0.82; p<0.0005) and Amphistegina lessonii (n=16; S/CaEPMA=0.089Mg/CaEPMA+0.26 with R2=0.42; p<0.0025). The location of the transects can be found in Table S1 and Figs. S1–S3. Note that the confidence interval (95 %) is indicated with dotted lines. Data are semiquantitative and therefore expressed as E∕CaEPMA, since calibration is performed against matrix unmatched mineral standards.

Download

3.4 Peak–base analysis

Based on 12 peak analyses, A. tepida has both the lowest peak and base values (E∕CaPEAKE∕CaBASE) with 4.9∕3.5 and 2.1∕1.5 mmol mol−1 for Mg∕CaEPMA and S∕CaEPMA, respectively. For B. marginata we analyzed eight transects, with average peak and base values of 7.04.1 and 2.51.5 for Mg∕CaEPMA and S∕CaEPMA, respectively. Based on nine transects, A. lessonii has the highest values for mmol mol−1 both S∕CaEPMA and Mg∕CaEPMA for peak and base, 56.620.2 and 6.91.9 mmol mol−1 for Mg∕CaEPMA and S∕CaEPMA, respectively. These data are summarized in Fig. 7 and Table 2.

Table 2Results from peak–base analysis of A. tepida (n=11), B. marginata (n=8) and A. lessonii (n=10), with average peak (E∕CaMAX) and base (E∕CaMIN) values in mmol mol−1 and ΔMIN  MAX parameters (mmol mol−1; E/CaMAX-E/CaMIN) and peak factor (x; E/CaMAX/E/CaMIN); for details see methodology Sect. 2.3.4).

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

Peak factors of Mg∕CaEPMA and S∕CaEPMA are very similar within the species A. tepida and B. marginata, respectively, between 1.4× (Mg∕CaEPMA) and 1.5× (S∕Ca) for A. tepida and 1.7× (both Mg∕CaEPMA and S∕CaEPMA) for B. marginata. For A. lessonii the peak factor is much higher for both S∕CaEPMA (3.6×) and Mg∕CaEPMA (2.8×), indicating more pronounced peaks in the latter species. The peak and base value of S∕CaEPMA are very similar for both low Mg species; average base values are 1.5 mmol mol−1 and peak values are 2.1–2.5 mmol mol−1. Amphistegina lessonii has slightly higher base values for S∕CaEPMA (1.9 mmol mol−1), but the average peak value of S∕CaEPMA is higher (6.9 mmol mol−1). When comparing the difference between peak values of Mg∕Ca and S∕Ca, the S∕Ca peak is 43 % and 12 % of the Mg∕Ca peak for both respective species A. tepida and A. lessonii, which might be reflected in the steeper slope of S∕Ca-Mg∕Ca relation for A. tepida observed in the transects (Fig. 6).

4 Discussion
Back to toptop

4.1 Foraminiferal S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca as a function of temperature

Shell Mg∕Ca of specimens of A. lessonii grown under controlled temperatures increases, with 1.8 mmol mol−1 per C (Fig. 3). Even though the Mg∕Ca–temperature relationship has been studied for Amphistegina lessonii in the field (Raja et al., 2005), to our knowledge, this is the first laboratory Mg∕Ca–temperature calibration for Amphistegina spp. In inorganic carbonate precipitation studies, temperature is suggested to increase the thermodynamic Mg partitioning coefficient (Katz, 1973), which is also often used to explain the positive correlation between Mg and temperature in foraminiferal calcite. This abiogenic effect of temperature is, however, not a sufficient explanation and is therefore thought to be enhanced or modified by a biological processes (Branson et al., 2013). Studies on the distribution of Mg in foraminiferal calcite show that temperature modulates the Mg∕Ca values of both the high-concentration bands and the low-concentration baselines (Spero et al., 2015; Fehrenbacher et al., 2017; Geerken et al., 2019). Although we observe an increase in S with Mg for different species, S incorporation does not increase over the temperature range studied here (Fig. 3b). Within the species A. lessonii we found a S∕Ca-Mg∕Ca slope of 9 % (Fig. 6), which would translate to an increase in shell S∕Ca of 1.4 mmol mol−1, when Mg∕Ca values increase from 20 to 35 mmol mol−1 over the studied temperature range (Figs. 3 and S1). The absence of an effect of temperature on S∕Ca suggests that the process responsible for increasing Mg does not affect SO42- substitution for CO32- in the crystal lattice. Since temperature-induced changes in Mg incorporation do not increase foraminiferal S∕Ca, Mg∕Ca and S∕Ca might therefore covary due to a different process, possibly by mechanisms involved in biomineralization.

4.2 Mg and S distribution in the foraminiferal shell

For all three species studied here we observe a positive correlation between Mg∕Ca and S∕Ca within chamber walls (intra-specimen variability; for an example, see Fig. 1c and last part of Sect. 3.3), between transect maps for each species (inter-specimen variability; Fig. 6) and between species (inter-species variability; Fig. 4). Both bands of high S (and high Mg) seem to be located close to organic linings, as shown previously for A. gibbosa (by EPMA; van Dijk et al., 2017a), A. lobifera (by electron probe WDS; Erez, 2003) and Orbulina universa (by nanoSIMS; Paris et al., 2014). The presence of organic material could cause a higher Mg content due to increased adsorption of Mg (Mavromatis et al., 2017). If this is also the case for other elements, including S, this could explain the observed covariation within chambers (Fig. 5), as suggested earlier for the planktonic foraminifer Pulleniatina obliquiloculata by Kunioka et al. (2006). However, this is disputed by the work of Busenberg and Plummer (1985) and Kitano et al. (1975), which shows that SO42- (as well as Na, Amiel et al., 1973) is predominately present in solid solution and not as a component of the organic matrix of biogenic (Mg) calcites.

As shown in Fig. 1d, the relative intensity of Mg∕Ca and S∕Ca for different peaks in the same transect are not always similar (e.g., rightmost peaks in Mg∕Ca and S∕Ca are equally high, whereas the S∕Ca peak in the middle of the chamber wall is much lower than that of Mg∕Ca), suggesting that S and Mg are spatially (and potentially temporary) correlated, but their concentrations must be partly decoupled as well. For Mg∕Ca, peak and base values are higher for A. lessonii than for the low Mg species A. tepida and B. marginata (Fig. 7). The higher Mg∕Ca in shells of A. lessonii compared to the two low Mg species (A. tepida and B. marginata) appears to be caused by an increase in both peak and base concentrations in A. lessonii specimens, already suggested by Geerken et al. (2019). In contrast, the base values (i.e., non-band area) of S∕Ca seem to be very similar for all the three species (1.5±0.1 mmol mol−1 for both A. tepida and B. marginata and 1.9±0.2 mmol mol−1 for A. lessonii) suggesting that the increase in S∕Ca for species with higher Mg incorporation (Fig. 4) might be due to higher S peaks in the S∕Ca banding.

https://www.biogeosciences.net/16/2115/2019/bg-16-2115-2019-f07

Figure 7Average peak (black bars) and base (grey bars) values (Mg∕CaEPMA, panel a; S∕CaEPMA, panel b) with “peak factor” (E∕CaMAXE∕CaMIN; see methodology Sect. 2.3.4 and Fig. 2) of three investigated species, low Mg species – A. tepida and B. marginata – and intermediate Mg species – A. lessonii. Error bars indicate 2 SD. For details, see Table 2.

Download

By comparing S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca values within transects we can test whether there is a correlation of S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca between specimens of the same species (inter-specimen variability). Individual transects were compared for each of the three species, showing a significant positive correlation between S∕CaEPMA and Mg∕CaEPMA (Fig. 6). Based on the slopes of the regression, S∕Ca increases with ∼37 % and ∼39 % for A. tepida and B. marginata, respectively, and ∼9 % for A. lessonii relative to Mg∕Ca. The larger benthic foraminifer A. lessonii has the highest S incorporation but the least sensitive S∕Ca-Mg∕Ca slope. In all species, higher or lower average Mg∕Ca and S∕Ca values are likely caused by, respectively, more or less intense banding between specimens (i.e., inter-species variability). The peak of bands of Mg and S of the small benthic species (A. tepida and B. marginata) are much closer. Peak S∕Ca are 43 % and 36 % of Mg∕Ca, respectively, in these species, rather than for A. lessonii in which the S∕Ca peak is 12 % of the Mg∕Ca peak. This results in a higher relative increase in S∕Ca with Mg∕Ca for the small benthic species and thus a steeper S∕Ca-Mg∕Ca slope. Still, although the slopes differ between these groups, S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca are consistently positively correlated.

4.3 What controls Mg2+ and SO42- uptake?

Correlation between S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca in foraminiferal calcite (Fig. 6) might reflect (i) precipitation processes occurring at the crystal–solution interface (e.g., effects of lattice strain and crystal growth rate) or in the solution occupying the site of calcification (e.g., speciation of elements in seawater and the effect of elevated pH), (ii) biomineralization-related processes, like a coupling of ion transport to the site of calcification, or (iii) a combination of both. The amount of variability and unknowns in combination with the lack of knowledge of crucial processes involved in foraminiferal calcification make it challenging to assess which processes are ultimately responsible for the uptake and incorporation of both sulfate and magnesium into foraminiferal calcite. However, the observed lack of a temperature effect on S incorporation, in contrast to the major impact of temperature on Mg∕Ca, may render some explanations more likely than others.

4.3.1 Calcite precipitation and physicochemical conditions

The observed link between S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca might be explained by investigating parameters involved in inorganic precipitation studies. Chemical processes operating at the crystal–solution interface or in the fluid contained in the site of calcification might give insights into the observed correlation between sulfate and magnesium incorporation in foraminiferal calcite, as well as the temperature effect on Mg incorporation. Magnesium ions in the parent solution have been found to increase the coprecipitation of other elements (Okumura and Kitano, 1986). However, this is observed for alkali metal ions, which are in interstitial positions or substitute for Ca2+ in the crystal lattice, while SO42- is hypothesized to exchange for CO32- ions (Pingitore et al., 1995; Perrin et al., 2017; Berry, 1998). Besides promoting coprecipitation, incorporation of magnesium in carbonate is suggested to cause strain on the crystal lattice, leading to distortion and an increase in the incorporation of other elements (Mucci and Morse, 1983). This theory has been used to explain incorporation of certain elements, like Na+ and Sr2+ in larger benthic foraminifera (Evans et al., 2015). Besides the lack of study on the incorporation of sulfate with increasing Mg content, based on our data, the correlation between Mg∕Ca and S∕Ca cannot be explained by crystal lattice distortion. The lack of response of S∕Ca to (temperature-induced) changes in Mg∕Ca (Fig. 3) together with the similar base values of S∕Ca for all three investigated species, while base values for Mg∕Ca vary between species (Fig. 7), shows that S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca are not always correlated, which should be the case with this hypothesis.

The effect of temperature on Mg∕Ca has been comprehensively studied for inorganic carbonates, by controlled precipitation experiments (for a summary see Mucci, 1987). Over the last decades, several explanations have been proposed to explain the relation between temperature and Mg incorporation in inorganic carbonates. Firstly, the partitioning of certain elements in inorganic experiments heavily relies on precipitation rate (e.g., Lorens, 1981). This was suggested for Mg incorporation (Chilingar, 1962), which may indicate that the increase in foraminiferal Mg∕Ca in our study could be explained by a positive effect of temperature on precipitation rate. However, this was disputed by several studies (e.g., Mucci and Morse, 1983; Mucci et al., 1985), showing inorganic precipitation rate does not change with temperature but depends on the Mg∕Ca ratio of the parent solution. On the other hand, partitioning of SO42- in synthetic calcite does increase with precipitation rate (Busenberg and Plummer, 1985). However, partitioning of elements in inorganic precipitation studies might differ greatly from foraminiferal calcite, since shell precipitation rate could be decoupled from crystal precipitation rate. To discuss if S∕Ca, as well as Mg∕Ca of foraminiferal calcite is affected by the growth rate of foraminiferal shells, we would need to study the precipitation rate of foraminiferal calcite as a function of temperature.

It has been proposed that calcium and magnesium transport to the site of calcification requires complete or partial dehydration of these ions, an energy-consuming process that is influenced by temperature (Mucci, 1986; Morse et al., 2007; Arvidson and Mackenzie, 2000). Rehydration of these ions at the site of calcification (SOC) may furthermore determine isotopic fractionation during calcium carbonate precipitation (Mavromatis et al., 2013). Since dehydration of magnesium ions costs less energy at higher temperatures, it may be expected that there would be more dehydrated and transportable Mg available. This would lead to an increased (accidental) transport of Mg2+ to the SOC by Ca2+ pumps, leading to a positive effect of temperature on Mg∕Ca or an increased selective removal of Mg2+ resulting in theory in a lower shell Mg∕Ca at higher temperatures. Since the latter is not observed, the effect of the (de)hydration of Mg ions is only likely in biomineralization models where Mg is not selectively removed, like the transmembrane transport (TMT) mixing model (Nehrke et al., 2013). Although this explains the lack of a clear temperature effect on S∕Ca values, it does not explain the co-regulation of S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca.

Speciation of elements in seawater as a function of carbonate chemistry parameters (e.g., [CO32-] and/or pH) has been proposed as an explanation for the incorporation of Zn and U in foraminiferal calcite (Djogić and Branica, 1991; Keul et al., 2013; van Dijk et al., 2017c). The effect of temperature and pH on the activity or bioavailability of different chemical species of Mg and S in seawater has not been studied so far but can be modeled using the software package PHREEQC (Parkhurst and Appelo, 1999) using the in-software llnl database and standard seawater composition. This allows us to test two different conditions: (A) variable temperature with stable pCO2 (current atmosphere) and salinity (35) and (B) constant temperature and salinity (25 C and 35, respectively) and increasing pH and stable alkalinity of 2300 µmol kg−1 seawater (Fig. 8). Using CO2SYS, other carbon parameters, including dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), were calculated with K1 and K2 from of Lueker et al. (2000).

https://www.biogeosciences.net/16/2115/2019/bg-16-2115-2019-f08

Figure 8Two exercises using PHREEQC showing activity of SO42-, Ca2+ and MgCO3 at (a) different temperatures (temperature range of controlled culture experiment indicated in grey) and (b) different pH. Chosen pH range reflects external and internal pH shift during chamber formation (Glas et al., 2012; de Nooijer et al., 2009; Toyofuku et al., 2017).

Download

At variable temperature, the model shows a small decrease in the activity of SO42-, whereas for Mg species, only activity of MgCO3 complexes increases, while activity ratio of Mg2+ and Ca2+ remains stable over this range. If foraminifera use MgCO3 complexes when calcifying, this could explain the observed temperature effect. When temperature changes from 20 to 30 C, the activity of SO42- decreases by 8 % (due to a small increase in the activity of MgSO4-), while the activity of MgCO3 increases by 28 %. This could, in part, explain the lack and presence of an effect of temperature on foraminiferal S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca, respectively, when assuming foraminifera incorporate this species of magnesium during biomineralization.

This might, in part, control the ultimate E∕Ca if these species are used to precipitate the foraminiferal shell. During chamber addition, pH changes externally to the foraminifera (pH < 8; Glas et al., 2012; Toyofuku et al., 2017) and internally at the site of calcification or in seawater vacuoles (de Nooijer et al., 2009). Availability of SO42- remains similar when pH changes, while presence of MgCO3 increases with pH, especially when pH > 8 (Fig. 8b), which argues in favor of a role of MgCO3 complexes in foraminiferal calcification. Still, when comparing the amplitude in Mg∕Ca from 21.2 to 29.5 C, incorporation almost doubles (Mg∕Ca increases ∼72 %; Fig. 3 and Table S2), whereas the change in relative abundance of MgCO3 complexes increases only by 28 %. Hence, changes in the amount of MgCO3 complexes does not explain the full range observed.

4.3.2 Element transport during biomineralization

Based on the transmembrane transport mixing model (TMT; Nehrke et al., 2013; Mewes et al., 2015), Mg2+ might be accidentally transported to the site of calcification by Ca channels or pumps, as well as by passive transport (e.g., leakage, initial seawater enclosed at the site of calcification or seawater endocytosis), while SO42- would not be transported by the Ca channels or pumps. Only prior to or at the first stages of chamber formation, when the membrane is perhaps not fully closed (Nagai et al., 2018) and the fluid in the site of calcification (SOC) resembles seawater, SO42- is incorporated due to the relatively high [SO42-] in seawater. The clear single peak at the start of the lamella, as shown by the EPMA analysis, might indicate there is either much more sulfate present at the start of calcification, or the CO32- concentration is still low, and hence the SO42- to CO32- ratio.

In the seawater vacuolization (SWV) model (Bentov et al., 2009), the main source of ions is from the endocytosis of seawater. The Mg∕Ca of the fluid in these seawater vacuoles is lowered (<0.1 mol mol−1; Evans et al., 2018), but it is not known if the sulfate concentration is regulated in these vacuoles, making it impossible to assess whether Mg2+ and SO42- concentrations in the vacuoles are correlated. However, the (small) increase in pH of the vacuoles (∼8.7 for species Amphistegina lobifera; Bentov et al., 2009) can decrease the [SO42-]/[CO32-] of the vacuoles.

The similar and spatial stable baseline values for S∕Ca for the three species studied here suggest that uptake or transport of SO42- to the site of calcification during the shell thickening phase of calcification is matched by incorporation of SO42- into the shell matrix, leading to a similar S∕Ca of the non-band areas. Considering both models individually, it is impossible to explain the correlation between SO42- and Mg2+ incorporation. However, by considering certain constraints on element transport offered by both models, we can hypothesize which E∕Ca might be characteristic for both end-member models to understand the relation of Mg∕Ca and S∕Ca on species scale (Fig. 4). We consider three different processes, each resulting in a different E∕Ca signature that foraminifera might employ to take up calcium and carbon.

  • i.

    SWV dominated. During endocytosis, Mg∕Ca in the vacuoles will be actively lowered, while [SO42-]/[CO32-] in the vacuoles is lowered due to increase in pH in the vacuoles.

  • ii.

    Ca channel-dominated. Due to the transport of Ca2+ through Ca channels to the site of calcification, Mg∕Ca will be lowered, while there is no effect on the SO4∕CO3 from which calcite is precipitated.

  • iii.

    Proton pumping. Pumping of protons out of the SOC (Toyofuku et al., 2017) will increase its pH and shift the speciation of inorganic carbon towards CO32-. This increase in [CO32-] will lead to lower SO42-/CO32- values in the site of calcification.

All currently available data from previous culture and field studies in which values for both S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca data are available (van Dijk et al., 2017a; Mezger et al., 2019), combined with values from the controlled temperature study and the Burgers' Zoo specimens, as well as the semiquantitative data from EPMA analysis (Sect. 3.3), are presented in Fig. 9 and Table S4. Because carbonate-associated sulfur in foraminifera is incorporated as SO42- and the ratio between Ca and CO3 is ∼1, S∕Ca can be converted (1:1) and expressed as SO42-/CO32-.

https://www.biogeosciences.net/16/2115/2019/bg-16-2115-2019-f09

Figure 9Average values of S∕Ca, expressed as SO42-/CO32-, versus Mg∕Ca of different hyaline (circles) and porcelaneous (diamonds) species of foraminifera of this study (open symbols) and other studies (grey symbols), including values obtained for the NFHS (for a description see Mezger et al., 2016). Culture experiments with varying salinity (c), temperature (1) and pCO2 (d, e), min and maximum ranges are indicated by grey bars but in most cases fall within the symbol. Values of foraminiferal E∕Ca can be found in Table S4. Values for Mg∕Ca of inorganic precipitated calcite of Mucci and Morse (1983) are indicated with the grey bars; SD is included. * Average values for transect maps (square symbols; for details see Sect. 3.3) are semiquantitative.

Download

In general, S incorporation increases linearly with increasing Mg content, with a S∕Ca-Mg∕Ca slope of ∼6 %, i.e., if Mg∕Ca increases by 1 mmol mol−1, S∕Ca increases by 0.06 mmol mol−1. Interestingly, no offset is observed between porcelaneous and high Mg hyaline species, as has been noted before for other elements (as observed for, e.g., Na∕Ca; van Dijk et al., 2017b). Both groups seem to have a characteristic chemical signature: hyaline species have in general low S and Mg incorporation (except for the high Mg hyaline species, like Heterostegina depressa), while porcelaneous species have high S and Mg values. The combination of low S∕Ca and Mg∕Ca for planktonic and small benthic hyaline foraminifera might be the result of the combination of Ca transport and proton pumping, two processes already linked in low Mg foraminifer Ammonia tepida (Toyofuku et al., 2017). High Mg hyaline and porcelaneous foraminifera seem to occupy the SWV dominated region, which is supported by both the observation of seawater vacuoles in hyaline species and the calcification pathway of porcelaneous species, which is suggested to take place intracellular in the form of calcite needle formation in vacuole-like structures. This data highlights the fundamentally different calcification pathways proposed before for these two groups (e.g., Berthold, 1976; Hemleben et al., 1986). However, due to the limited amount of constraints on both models it is currently difficult to fully assess the impact of both calcification pathways on element incorporation, and therefore we cannot exclude other factors that might be responsible for the correlation between Mg and S incorporation. Furthermore, in Fig. 9 we also present Mg∕Ca values of inorganic calcite from Mucci and Morse (1983), values that are often used to compare Mg∕Ca values of foraminifera with inorganic calcite (Evans et al., 2015; van Dijk et al., 2017b). However, new evidence has arisen that foraminifera might precipitate vaterite, which ultimately transforms to calcite, indicating a complex pathway and partitioning of elements during calcification.

4.3.3 Sulfate at the site of calcification

Species-specific differences in the relative contribution of SWV and TMT might provide an explanation of our results. However, while this could give insights into the incorporation of S and Mg as a function of temperature and explain species-specific differences, we did not consider the inhibition effect of sulfate and the probable nonclassical calcification pathway foraminifera utilize to create their shell (Jacob et al., 2017). Sulfate is a known inhibitor for precipitation of calcite (e.g., Manoli and Dalas, 2000; Kitano, 1962) but does play a role in the transformation from amorphous calcium carbonate into vaterite (see Bots et al., 2012, and references therein). Vaterite transforms into calcite via dissolution–re-precipitation when solution SO42-:CO32- <1.3 (Fernández-Díaz et al., 2010). A recent study has proposed that certain species of planktonic foraminifera create their shell by a pathway involving vaterite phases that transform ultimately to calcite (Jacob et al., 2017), which might suggest the SO42-:CO32- at the site of calcification is >1 when precipitation of the carbonate shell commences. Just prior to formation of a new chamber, the sulfate concentration at the SOC is probably similar to that in seawater, assuming the calcification fluid is composed of either a small volume of seawater enclosed by the protective envelope separating the SOC from seawater or by seawater vacuoles (SWV model). With a seawater concentration of ∼30 mM [SO42-], it is very likely that the SO42-:CO32- at the site of calcification is >1, but it is dependent on the carbonate chemistry at the SOC. Laboratory experiments have revealed that the internal pH of a foraminifera is elevated, with (species-specific) values ranging from ∼8.75 (Bentov et al., 2009) to ≥9 (de Nooijer et al., 2009) at the start of shell formation due to proton pumping (Toyofuku et al., 2017), which lowers the pH in the microenvironment surrounding the foraminifer (Glas et al., 2012). When assuming the SO42- and inorganic carbonate concentration at SOC is equal to natural seawater at 400 ppm CO2 (∼2650 mg L−2 [SO42-], ∼2100µmol L−1 DIC), the elevation of internal pH to 9 creates a SO42-:CO32- of ∼25, leading to the stabilization of vaterite and a band enriched in SO42- close to the primary organic sheet, which we observe in the chamber wall distribution of all three of our species (Fig. 5). Note that this is a maximum theoretical SO42-:CO32-, since DIC might be higher in the SOC, but it is very unlikely that the DIC increases to a point where the ratio will be <1. During precipitation, the SO42-:CO32- likely decreases during the thickening of the chamber wall, due to continuous active pumping of protons out of the site of calcification (Toyofuku et al., 2017). This implies that the S∕Ca distribution in the foraminiferal chamber wall may reflect a change in SO42-/CO32- of the calcifying fluid in the site of calcification (SOC) during precipitation of the shell wall. Assuming a stable D during calcification (e.g., D×1000=0.013; Busenberg and Plummer, 1985), SO42-/CO32- at the SOC would be a factor of 3.6 higher in the thin, high-concentration band (with an S∕Ca of 6.9 mmol mol−1; Fig. 7) compared to the broader, low-concentration band (with an S∕Ca of 1.9 mmol mol−1). This decrease by a factor of 3.6 could be due to an increase in [CO32-] and/or a decrease in [SO42-] during precipitation. The latter could be the result of inclusion of small amounts of sulfate in the SOC at the beginning of chamber formation and ongoing incorporation of sulfate in the foraminiferal calcite. However, since the S∕Ca is not decreasing towards the outer side of the shell in the low-concentration band, the former process, i.e., increasing CO32-, might be more likely. An increase in CO32- at the SOC from the first stage of chamber formation (high in S∕Ca) to the broader second part (low in S∕Ca) could be caused by an increase in internal pH due to proton pumping (Toyofuku et al., 2017). The band of high S∕Ca would then be precipitated when proton pumping has not yet reached its maximum rate and the internal pH is still rising (Glas et al., 2013). However, to confirm this hypothesis, a more precise characterization of the calcification fluid's chemistry is necessary.

5 Conclusions
Back to toptop

Systematics in the incorporation of different elements in foraminiferal shells can be used to test calcification models and hence processes involved in precipitation of calcium carbonates. Our dataset, including both hyaline and porcelaneous species of foraminifera with a wide range of shell Mg content, shows a positive relation between Mg and S incorporated in their shells. This correlation can be found on species scale but also between specimens of the same species and on a microscale in the heterogeneous distribution in the shell wall. In contrast, we find no effect of temperature on the S∕Ca values of foraminiferal calcite, even though shell Mg∕Ca increases. The lack of an observed temperature effect on S∕Ca for Amphistegina lessonii might be due to the decrease in activity of sulfate with temperature, counterbalancing the increase in S∕Ca due to increasing shell Mg∕Ca. Nevertheless, the lack of certain crucial key factors, like the chemistry at the site of calcification, make it difficult to fully understand the pathway of both elements during calcification. The differences observed for the three species highlights the diversity of and variation in processes involved in biomineralization in foraminifera. Mechanisms suggested for inorganic precipitation, like, for example, crystal lattice strain, precipitation rate and ion dehydration, fail to independently explain our findings in full. Comparing our data with existing biomineralization models implies that, irrespective of the model, foraminiferal Mg∕Ca and S∕Ca are governed by two different but co-regulated pathways. Mg∕Ca is primarily affected by Ca (or Mg) transport and passive transport, while S∕Ca is mainly governed by proton pump intensity and passive transport. The observed patterns imply that these pathways are spatially and temporally linked, and hence that for all species of foraminifera, take-up of calcium and carbon is co-regulated.

Data availability
Back to toptop
Data availability. 

Data are available and can be requested from the corresponding author (inge.van.dijk@nioz.nl).

Supplement
Back to toptop
Supplement. 

The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2115-2019-supplement.

Author contributions
Back to toptop
Author contributions. 

IvD, LJdN and GJR planned and performed the temperature culture experiment. CB, AM and SO obtained specimens used for EPMA. IvD, CB, AM and EG performed measurements and analyzed the results. GJR facilitated the technical realization of the study. All authors contributed to the discussion and interpretation of the results. The manuscript was written under the lead of IvD.

Competing interests
Back to toptop
Competing interests. 

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements
Back to toptop
Acknowledgements. 

We would like to thank Wim Boer for support with LA-Q-ICP-MS and SF-ICP-MS measurements and both Tilly Bouten and Sergei Matveev for technical support with the EPMA analysis. Lastly, we thank Jan-Berend Stuut for the usage of the Hitachi TM3000 SEM.

Financial support
Back to toptop
Financial support. 

This research has been supported by the Darwin Centre for Biogeosciences (project 3020), the Netherlands Earth System Science Center (grant no. 024.002.001), the University Bretagne Loire and Angers Loire Metropole (grant project MOXY), and the EC2CO-LEFE and CNRS (grant project MANGA 2D).

Review statement
Back to toptop
Review statement. 

This paper was edited by Hiroshi Kitazato and reviewed by Guillaume Paris and one anonymous referee.

References
Back to toptop

Amiel, A. J., Friedman, G. M., and Miller, D. S.: Distribution and nature of incorporation of trace elements in modern aragonitic corals, Sedimentology, 20, 47–64, 1973. 

Arvidson, R. S. and Mackenzie, F. T.: Temperature dependence of mineral precipitation rates along the CaCO3MgCO3 join, Aquat. Geochem., 6, 249–256, 2000. 

Barker, S., Greaves, M., and Elderfield, H.: A study of cleaning procedures used for foraminiferal Mg∕Ca paleothermometry, Geochem. Geophy., 4, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GC000559, 2003. 

Barras, C., Mouret, A., Nardelli, M. P., Metzger, E., Petersen, J., La, C., Filipsson, H. L., and Jorissen, F.: Experimental calibration of manganese incorporation in foraminiferal calcite, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 237, 49–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.06.009, 2018. 

Beerling, D. J. and Royer, D. L.: Convergent cenozoic CO2 history, Nat. Geosci., 4, 418–420, 2011. 

Bentov, S. and Erez, J.: Impact of biomineralization processes on the Mg content of foraminiferal shells: A biological perspective, Geochem. Geophy., 7, Q01P08, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC001015, 2006. 

Bentov, S., Brownlee, C., and Erez, J.: The role of seawater endocytosis in the biomineralization process in calcareous foraminifera, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 21500–21504, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906636106, 2009. 

Berry, J. N.: Sulfate in foraminiferal calcium carbonate: Investigating a potential proxy for sea water carbonate ion concentration, Master of Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 88 pp., 1998. 

Berthold, W.-U.: Biomineralisation bei milioliden Foraminiferen und die Matritzen-Hypothese, Naturwissenschaften, 63, 196–197, 1976. 

Bots, P., Benning, L. G., Rodriguez-blanco, J.-D., Roncal-Herrero, T., and Shaw, S.: Mechanistic insights into the crystallization of amorphous calcium carbonate to vaterite, Cryst. Growth Des., 12, 3806–3814, https://doi.org/10.1021/cg300676b, 2012. 

Branson, O., Redfern, S. A., Tyliszczak, T., Sadekov, A., Langer, G., Kimoto, K., and Elderfield, H.: The coordination of Mg in foraminiferal calcite, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 383, 134–141, 2013. 

Busenberg, E. and Plummer, L. N.: Kinetic and thermodynamic factors controlling the distribution of SO32- and Na+ in calcites and selected aragonites, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 49, 713–725, 1985. 

Chilingar, G. V.: Dependence on temperature of Ca∕Mg ratio of skeletal structures of organisms and direct chemical precipitates out of sea water, Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 61, 45–60, 1962. 

de Nooijer, L. J., Toyofuku, T., and Kitazato, H.: Foraminifera promote calcification by elevating their intracellular pH, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 15374–15378, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904306106, 2009. 

de Villiers, S., Greaves, M., and Elderfield, H.: An intensity ratio calibration method for the accurate determination of Mg∕Ca and Sr∕Ca of marine carbonates by ICP-AES, Geochem. Geophy., 3, 2001GC000169, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000169, 2002. 

Djogić, R. and Branica, M.: Dissolved uranyl complexed species in artificial seawater, Mar. Chem., 36, 121–135, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(09)90058-5, 1991. 

Dueñas-Bohórquez, A., Raitzsch, M., de Nooijer, L. J., and Reichart, G.-J.: Independent impacts of calcium and carbonate ion concentration on Mg and Sr incorporation in cultured benthic foraminifera, Mar. Micropaleontol., 81, 122–130, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2011.08.002, 2011. 

Erez, J.: The source of ions for biomineralization in foraminifera and their implications for paleoceanographic proxies, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 54, 115–149, https://doi.org/10.2113/0540115, 2003. 

Ernst, S., Janse, M., Renema, W., Kouwenhoven, T., Goudeau, M.-L., and Reichart, G.-J.: Benthic foraminifera in a large Indo-Pacific coral reef aquarium, J. Foramin. Res., 41, 101–113, https://doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.41.2.101, 2011. 

Evans, D., Erez, J., Oron, S., and Müller, W.: Mg∕Ca-temperature and seawater-test chemistry relationships in the shallow-dwelling large benthic foraminifera Operculina ammonoides, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 148, 325–342, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.09.039, 2015. 

Evans, D., Müller, W., and Erez, J.: Assessing foraminifera biomineralisation models through trace element data of cultures under variable seawater chemistry, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 236, 198–217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.02.048, 2018. 

Fehrenbacher, J. S., Russell, A. D., Davis, C. V., Gagnon, A. C., Spero, H. J., Cliff, J. B., Zhu, Z., and Martin, P.: Link between light-triggered Mg-banding and chamber formation in the planktic foraminifera Neogloboquadrina dutertrei, Nat. Commun., 8, 15441, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15441, 2017. 

Fernández-Díaz, L., Fernández-González, Á., and Prieto, M.: The role of sulfate groups in controlling CaCO3 polymorphism, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 6064–6076, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.08.010, 2010. 

Geerken, E., de Nooijer, L. J., van Dijk, I., and Reichart, G.-J.: Impact of salinity on element incorporation in two benthic foraminiferal species with contrasting magnesium contents, Biogeosciences, 15, 2205–2218, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2205-2018, 2018. 

Geerken, E., De Nooijer, L. J., Roepert, A., Polerecky, L., King, H. E., and Reichart, G. J.: Element banding and organic linings within chamber walls of two benthic foraminifera, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 3598, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40298-y, 2019. 

Glas, M. S., Langer, G., and Keul, N.: Calcification acidifies the microenvironment of a benthic foraminifer (Ammonia sp.), J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 424–425, 53–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.05.006, 2012. 

Guillard, R. R. and Ryther, J. H.: Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: I. Cyclotella Nana Hustedt, and Detonula Confervacea (CLEVE) Gran, Can. J. Microbiol., 8, 229–239, 1962. 

Guillong, M., Meier, D. L., Allan, M. M., Heinrich, C. A., and Yardley, B. W.: SILLS: A MATLAB-based program for the reduction of laser ablation ICP-MS data of homogeneous materials and inclusions, Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Series, 40, 328–333, 2008. 

Hemleben, C. H., Anderson, O. R., Berthold, W., and Spindler, M.: Calcification and chamber formation in Foraminifera-a brief overview, in: Biomineralization in lower plants and animals, edited by: Leadbeater, B. S. and Riding, R., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 237–249, 1986. 

Hönisch, B. and Hemming, N. G.: Surface ocean pH response to variations in pCO2 through two full glacial cycles, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 236, 305–314, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.04.027, 2005. 

Jacob, D. E., Wirth, R., Agbaje, O. B. A., Branson, O., and Eggins, S. M.: Planktic foraminifera form their shells via metastable carbonate phases, Nature Commun., 8, 1265, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00955-0, 2017. 

Katz, A.: The interaction of magnesium with calcite during crystal growth at 25–90 C and one atmosphere, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 37, 1563–1586, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(73)90091-4, 1973. 

Keul, N., Langer, G., de Nooijer, L. J., Nehrke, G., Reichart, G.-J., and Bijma, J.: Incorporation of uranium in benthic foraminiferal calcite reflects seawater carbonate ion concentration, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 14, 102–111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gc004330, 2013. 

Kitano, Y.: The behavior of various inorganic ions in the separation of calcium carbonate from a bicarbonate solution, B. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 35, 1973–1980, 1962. 

Kitano, Y., Okumura, M., and Idogaki, M.: Incorporation of sodium, chloride and sulfate with calcium carbonate, Geochem. J., 9, 75–84, https://doi.org/10.2343/geochemj.9.75, 1975. 

Kunioka, D., Shirai, K., Takahata, N., Sano, Y., Toyofuku, T., and Ujiie, Y.: Microdistribution of Mg/Ca, Sr/Ca, and Ba/Ca ratios in Pulleniatina obliquiloculata test by using a NanoSIMS: Implication for the vital effect mechanism, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 7, Q12P20, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001280, 2006. 

Lorens, R. B.: Sr, Cd, Mn and Co distribution coefficients in calcite as a function of calcite precipitation rate, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 45, 553–561, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(81)90188-5, 1981. 

Lueker, T. J., Dickson, A. G., and Keeling, C. D.: Ocean pCO2 calculated from dissolved inorganic carbon, alkalinity, and equations for K1 and K2: validation based on laboratory measurements of CO2 in gas and seawater at equilibrium, Mar. Chem., 70, 105–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(00)00022-0, 2000. 

Manoli, F. and Dalas, E.: Spontaneous precipitation of calcium carbonate in the presence of chondroitin sulfate, J. Cryst. Growth, 217, 416–421, 2000. 

Mavromatis, V., Gautier, Q., Bosc, O., and Schott, J.: Kinetics of Mg partition and Mg stable isotope fractionation during its incorporation in calcite, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 114, 188–203, 2013. 

Mewes, A., Langer, G., de Nooijer, L. J., Bijma, J., and Reichart, G. J.: Effect of different seawater Mg2+ concentrations on calcification in two benthic foraminifers, Mar. Micropaleontol., 113, 56–64, 2014. 

Mewes, A., Langer, G., Thoms, S., Nehrke, G., Reichart, G.-J., de Nooijer, L. J., and Bijma, J.: Impact of seawater [Ca2+] on the calcification and calcite Mg∕Ca of Amphistegina lessonii, Biogeosciences, 12, 2153–2162, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2153-2015, 2015. 

Mezger, E. M., de Nooijer, L. J., Boer, W., Brummer, G. J. A., and Reichart, G. J.: Salinity controls on Na incorporation in Red Sea planktonic foraminifera, Paleoceanography, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003052, 2016. 

Mezger, E. M., Erdem, Z., Lattaud, J., van Erk, M., Schouten, S., and Reichart, G.-J.: Arabian Sea salinity and temperature changes over the last glacial cycle and impact on the oxygen minimum zone, in preparation, 2019. 

Morse, J. W., Arvidson, R. S., and Lüttge, A.: Calcium carbonate formation and dissolution, Chem. Rev., 107, 342–381, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr050358j, 2007. 

Mucci, A.: Growth kinetics and composition of magnesian calcite overgrowths precipitated from seawater: Quantitative influence of orthophosphate ions, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 50, 2255–2265, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(86)90080-3, 1986. 

Mucci, A.: Inlfuence of temperature on the composition of magnesian calcite overgrowths preciptated from seawater, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 51, 1977–1984, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(87)90186-4, 1987. 

Mucci, A. and Morse, J. W.: The incorporation of Mg2+ and Sr2+ into calcite overgrowths: influences of growth rate and solution composition, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 47, 217–233, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(83)90135-7, 1983. 

Mucci, A., Morse, J. W., and Kaminsky, M. S.: Auger spectroscopy analysis of magnesian calcite overgrowths precipitated from seawater and solutions of similar composition, Am. J. Sci., 285, 289–305, https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.285.4.289, 1985. 

Nagai, Y., Uematsu, K., Chen, C., Wani, R., Tyszka, J., and Toyofuku, T.: Weaving of biomineralization framework in rotaliid foraminifera: implications for paleoceanographic proxies, Biogeosciences, 15, 6773–6789, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6773-2018, 2018. 

Nehrke, G., Keul, N., Langer, G., de Nooijer, L. J., Bijma, J., and Meibom, A.: A new model for biomineralization and trace-element signatures of Foraminifera tests, Biogeosciences, 10, 6759–6767, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6759-2013, 2013. 

Nürnberg, D., Bijma, J., and Hemleben, C.: Assessing the reliability of magnesium in foraminiferal calcite as a proxy for water mass temperatures, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 60, 803–814, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(95)00446-7, 1996. 

Okai, T., Suzuki, A., Kawahata, H., Terashima, S., and Imai, N.: Preparation of a New Geological Survey of Japan Geochemical Reference Material: Coral JCp-1, Geostandard. Newslett., 26, 95–99, 2002. 

Okumura, M. and Kitano, Y.: Coprecipitation of alkali metal ions with calcium carbonate, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 50, 49–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(86)90047-5, 1986. 

Paris, G., Fehrenbacher, J. S., Sessions, A. L., Spero, H. J., and Adkins, J. F.: Experimental determination of carbonate-associated sulfate δ34S in planktonic foraminifera shells, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 15, 1452–1461, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gc005295, 2014. 

Parkhurst, D. L. and Appelo, C.: User's guide to PHREEQC (Version 2): A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations, US Geol. Surv, Denver, Colorado, 1999. 

Perrin, J., Rivard, C., Vielzeuf, D., Laporte, D., Fonquernie, C., Ricolleau, A., Cotte, M., and Floquet, N.: The coordination of sulfur in synthetic and biogenic Mg calcites: The red coral case, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 197, 226–244, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.10.017, 2017. 

Pingitore, N. E., Meitzner, G., and Love, K. M.: Identification of sulfate in natural carbonates by X-ray absorption spectroscopy, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 59, 2477–2483, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(95)00142-5, 1995. 

Raja, R., Saraswati, P. K., Rogers, K., and Iwao, K.: Magnesium and strontium compositions of recent symbiont-bearing benthic foraminifera, Mar. Micropaleontol., 58, 31–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2005.08.001, 2005. 

Reddy, M. M. and Nancollas, G. H.: The crystallization of calcium carbonate: IV. The effect of magnesium, strontium and sulfate ions, J. Cryst. Growth, 35, 33–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(76)90240-2, 1976. 

Reichart, G.-J., Jorissen, F., Anschutz, P., and Mason, P. R.: Single foraminiferal test chemistry records the marine environment, Geology, 31, 355–358, 2003. 

Spero, H. J., Eggins, S. M., Russell, A. D., Vetter, L., Kilburn, M. R., and Hönisch, B.: Timing and mechanism for intratest Mg∕Ca variability in a living planktic foraminifer, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 409, 32–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.10.030, 2015. 

Toyofuku, T., Suzuki, M., Suga, H., Sakai, S., Suzuki, A., Ishikawa, T., de Nooijer, L. J., Schiebel, R., Kawahata, H., and Kitazato, H.: Mg∕Ca and δ18O in the brackish shallow-water benthic foraminifer Ammonia “beccarii”, Mar. Micropaleontol., 78, 113–120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2010.11.003, 2011. 

Toyofuku, T., Matsuo, M. Y., de Nooijer, L. J., Nagai, Y., Kawada, S., Fujita, K., Reichart, G. J., Nomaki, H., Tsuchiya, M., Sakaguchi, H., and Kitazato, H.: Proton pumping accompanies calcification in foraminifera, Nat. Commun., 8, 14145, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14145, 2017. 

van Dijk, I., de Nooijer, L. J., Boer, W., and Reichart, G. J.: Sulfur in foraminiferal calcite as a potential proxy for seawater carbonate ion concentration, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 470, 64–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.04.031, 2017a. 

van Dijk, I., de Nooijer, L. J., and Reichart, G.-J.: Trends in element incorporation in hyaline and porcelaneous foraminifera as a function of pCO2, Biogeosciences, 14, 497–510, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-497-2017, 2017b. 

van Dijk, I., de Nooijer, L. J., Wolthers, M., and Reichart, G. J.: Impacts of pH and [CO32-] on the incorporation of Zn in foraminiferal calcite, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 197, 263–277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.10.031, 2017c. 

Zeebe, R. E. and Sanyal, A.: Comparison of two potential strategies of planktonic foraminifera for house building: Mg2+ or H+ removal?, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 66, 1159–1169, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00852-3, 2002. 

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Systematics in the incorporation of different elements in shells of marine organisms can be used to test calcification models and thus processes involved in precipitation of calcium carbonates. On different scales, we observe a covariation of sulfur and magnesium incorporation in shells of foraminifera, which provides insights into the mechanics behind shell formation. The observed patterns imply that all species of foraminifera actively take up calcium and carbon in a coupled process.
Systematics in the incorporation of different elements in shells of marine organisms can be used...
Citation