Journal cover Journal topic
Biogeosciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Biogeosciences, 11, 3437-3451, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3437-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
01 Jul 2014
Isoprene emissions track the seasonal cycle of canopy temperature, not primary production: evidence from remote sensing
P. N. Foster1, I. C. Prentice2,3, C. Morfopoulos4, M. Siddall1, and M. van Weele5 1Department of Earth Science, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UK
2AXA Chair of Biosphere and Climate Impacts, Department of Life Sciences, Grand Challenges in Ecosystems and the Environment and Grantham Institute for Climate Change, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK
3Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia
4Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK
5Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 201, 3730 AE De Bilt, the Netherlands
Abstract. Isoprene is important in atmospheric chemistry, but its seasonal emission pattern – especially in the tropics, where most isoprene is emitted – is incompletely understood. We set out to discover generalized relationships applicable across many biomes between large-scale isoprene emission and a series of potential predictor variables, including both observed and model-estimated variables related to gross primary production (GPP) and canopy temperature. We used remotely sensed atmospheric concentrations of formaldehyde, an intermediate oxidation product of isoprene, as a proxy for isoprene emission in 22 regions selected to span high to low latitudes, to sample major biomes, and to minimize interference from pyrogenic sources of volatile organic compounds that could interfere with the isoprene signal. Formaldehyde concentrations showed the highest average seasonal correlations with remotely sensed (r = 0.85) and model-estimated (r = 0.80) canopy temperatures. Both variables predicted formaldehyde concentrations better than air temperature (r= 0.56) and a "reference" isoprene model that combines GPP and an exponential function of temperature (r = 0.49), and far better than either remotely sensed green vegetation cover, fPAR (r = 0.25) or model-estimated GPP (r = 0.14). Gross primary production in tropical regions was anti-correlated with formaldehyde concentration (r = −0.30), which peaks during the dry season. Our results were most reliable in the tropics, where formaldehyde observational errors were the least. The tropics are of particular interest because they are the greatest source of isoprene emission as well as the region where previous modelling attempts have been least successful. We conjecture that positive correlations of isoprene emission with GPP and air temperature (as found in temperate forests) may arise simply because both covary with canopy temperature, peaking during the relatively short growing season. The lack of a general correlation between GPP and formaldehyde concentration in the seasonal cycle is consistent with experimental evidence that isoprene emission rates are largely decoupled from photosynthetic rates, and with the likely adaptive significance of isoprene emission in protecting leaves against heat damage and oxidative stress.

Citation: Foster, P. N., Prentice, I. C., Morfopoulos, C., Siddall, M., and van Weele, M.: Isoprene emissions track the seasonal cycle of canopy temperature, not primary production: evidence from remote sensing, Biogeosciences, 11, 3437-3451, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3437-2014, 2014.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Share