Journal Metrics

  • IF value: 3.753 IF 3.753
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 4.644 IF 5-year
    4.644
  • SNIP value: 1.376 SNIP 1.376
  • IPP value: 4.067 IPP 4.067
  • SJR value: 2.451 SJR 2.451
  • h5-index value: 57 h5-index 57
Biogeosciences, 7, 2351-2367, 2010
www.biogeosciences.net/7/2351/2010/
doi:10.5194/bg-7-2351-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Trends and regional distributions of land and ocean carbon sinks
J. L. Sarmiento1, M. Gloor2, N. Gruber3, C. Beaulieu1, A. R. Jacobson4, S. E. Mikaloff Fletcher1,*, S. Pacala5, and K. Rodgers1
1Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Program, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
2Earth and Biosphere Institute and School of Geography, Leeds University, Leeds, UK
3Environmental Physics, Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
4NOAA Earth System Research Lab, Global Monitoring Division, Boulder, Colorado, USA
5Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
*now at: the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand

Abstract. We show here an updated estimate of the net land carbon sink (NLS) as a function of time from 1960 to 2007 calculated from the difference between fossil fuel emissions, the observed atmospheric growth rate, and the ocean uptake obtained by recent ocean model simulations forced with reanalysis wind stress and heat and water fluxes. Except for interannual variability, the net land carbon sink appears to have been relatively constant at a mean value of −0.27 Pg C yr−1 between 1960 and 1988, at which time it increased abruptly by −0.88 (−0.77 to −1.04) Pg C yr−1 to a new relatively constant mean of −1.15 Pg C yr−1 between 1989 and 2003/7 (the sign convention is negative out of the atmosphere). This result is detectable at the 99% level using a t-test. The land use source (LU) is relatively constant over this entire time interval. While the LU estimate is highly uncertain, this does imply that most of the change in the net land carbon sink must be due to an abrupt increase in the land sink, LS = NLS – LU, in response to some as yet unknown combination of biogeochemical and climate forcing. A regional synthesis and assessment of the land carbon sources and sinks over the post 1988/1989 period reveals broad agreement that the Northern Hemisphere land is a major sink of atmospheric CO2, but there remain major discrepancies with regard to the sign and magnitude of the net flux to and from tropical land.

Citation: Sarmiento, J. L., Gloor, M., Gruber, N., Beaulieu, C., Jacobson, A. R., Mikaloff Fletcher, S. E., Pacala, S., and Rodgers, K.: Trends and regional distributions of land and ocean carbon sinks, Biogeosciences, 7, 2351-2367, doi:10.5194/bg-7-2351-2010, 2010.
 
Search BG
Final Revised Paper
PDF XML
Citation
Discussion Paper
Share