1Marine Palynology, Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology,
Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584 CD, the
2Division of Geology, Department of Earth and Environmental
Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven-Heverlee, 3001, Belgium
3School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University,
NE1 7RU, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
4Department of Sedimentology and Marine Geology, Faculty of Earth and
Life Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1018HV, the Netherlands
5Department of Geological Engineering, Middle East Technical
University, Ankara, Turkey
6Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX 78712, USA
7Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Landsdiep 4, 't
Horntje, Texel, 1797 SZ, the Netherlands
*These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 30 Jun 2016 – Discussion started: 03 Aug 2016
Abstract. It is commonly accepted that the mass extinction associated with the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary (∼ 66 Ma) is related to the environmental effects of a large extraterrestrial impact. The biological and oceanographic consequences of the mass extinction are, however, still poorly understood. According to the
Revised: 16 Dec 2016 – Accepted: 26 Jan 2017 – Published: 27 Feb 2017
Living Ocean model, the biological crisis at the K–Pg boundary resulted in a long-term reduction of export productivity in the early Paleocene. Here, we combine organic-walled dinoflagellate cyst (dinocyst) and benthic foraminiferal analyses to provide new insights into changes in the coupling of pelagic and benthic ecosystems. To this end, we perform dinocyst and benthic foraminiferal analyses on the recently discovered Tethyan K–Pg boundary section at Okçular, Turkey, and compare the results with other K–Pg boundary sites in the Tethys. The post-impact dominance of epibenthic morphotypes and an increase of inferred heterotrophic dinocysts in the early Paleocene at Okçular are consistent with published records from other western Tethyan sites. Together, these records indicate that during the early Paleocene more nutrients remained available for the Tethyan planktonic community, whereas benthic communities were deprived of food. Hence, in the post-impact phase the reduction of export productivity likely resulted in enhanced recycling of nutrients in the upper part of the water column, all along the western Tethyan margins.
Vellekoop, J., Woelders, L., Açikalin, S., Smit, J., van de Schootbrugge, B., Yilmaz, I. Ö., Brinkhuis, H., and Speijer, R. P.: Ecological response to collapse of the biological pump following the mass extinction at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary, Biogeosciences, 14, 885-900, doi:10.5194/bg-14-885-2017, 2017.