Journal cover Journal topic
Biogeosciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
Volume 8, issue 10
Biogeosciences, 8, 2917–2933, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2917-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Biogeosciences, 8, 2917–2933, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2917-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 18 Oct 2011

Research article | 18 Oct 2011

Seasonal variation in marine C:N:P stoichiometry: can the composition of seston explain stable Redfield ratios?

H. Frigstad1,2, T. Andersen3, D. O. Hessen3, L.-J. Naustvoll4, T. M. Johnsen5, and R. G. J. Bellerby1,2,6 H. Frigstad et al.
  • 1Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Allégaten 70, 5007 Bergen, Norway
  • 2Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway
  • 3Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway
  • 4Institute of Marine Research (IMR), Flødevigen Research Station, Nye Flødevigveien 20, 4814 His, Norway
  • 5Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Thormøhlensgate 53D, 5006 Bergen, Norway
  • 6Uni Bjerknes Centre, Uni Research, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway

Abstract. Seston is suspended particulate organic matter, comprising a mixture of autotrophic, heterotrophic and detrital material. Despite variable proportions of these components, marine seston often exhibits relatively small deviations from the Redfield ratio (C:N:P = 106:16:1). Two time-series from the Norwegian shelf in Skagerrak are used to identify drivers of the seasonal variation in seston elemental ratios. An ordination identified water mass characteristics and bloom dynamics as the most important drivers for determining C:N, while changes in nutrient concentrations and biomass were most important for the C:P and N:P relationships. There is no standardized method for determining the functional composition of seston and the fractions of POC, PON and PP associated with phytoplankton, therefore any such information has to be obtained by indirect means. In this study, a generalized linear model was used to differentiate between the live autotrophic and non-autotrophic sestonic fractions, and for both stations the non-autotrophic fractions dominated with respective annual means of 76 and 55%. This regression model approach builds on assumptions (e.g. constant POC:Chl-a ratio) and the robustness of the estimates were explored with a bootstrap analysis. In addition the autotrophic percentage calculated from the statistical model was compared with estimated phytoplankton carbon, and the two independent estimates of autotrophic percentage were comparable with similar seasonal cycles. The estimated C:nutrient ratios of live autotrophs were, in general, lower than Redfield, while the non-autotrophic C:nutrient ratios were higher than the live autotrophic ratios and above, or close to, the Redfield ratio. This is due to preferential remineralization of nutrients, and the P content mainly governed the difference between the sestonic fractions. Despite the seasonal variability in seston composition and the generally low contribution of autotrophic biomass, the variation observed in the total seston ratios was low compared to the variation found in dissolved and particulate pools. Sestonic C:N:P ratios close to the Redfield ratios should not be used as an indicator of phytoplankton physiological state, but could instead reflect varying contributions of sestonic fractions that sum up to an elemental ratio close to Redfield.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation