Journal cover Journal topic
Biogeosciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
Volume 5, issue 6
Biogeosciences, 5, 1797–1808, 2008
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-1797-2008
© Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Carbon cycling in Sub-Saharan Africa

Biogeosciences, 5, 1797–1808, 2008
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-1797-2008
© Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  23 Dec 2008

23 Dec 2008


Response of carbon fluxes to water relations in a savanna ecosystem in South Africa

W. L. Kutsch1, N. Hanan2, B. Scholes3, I. McHugh4, W. Kubheka2, H. Eckhardt5, and C. Williams6 W. L. Kutsch et al.
  • 1Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry, P.O. Box 10 01 64, 07701 Jena, Germany
  • 2Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA
  • 3Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Natural Resources and the Environment, P.O. Box 395, 0001 Pretoria, South Africa
  • 4School of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
  • 5South African National Parks (SANParks), Scientific Services, Skukuza, South Africa
  • 6Graduate School of Geography, Clark University Worcester, MA, USA

Abstract. The principal mechanisms that connect carbon fluxes with water relations in savanna ecosystems were studied by using eddy covariance method in a savanna ecosystem at Kruger National Park, South Africa. Since the annual drought and rewetting cycle is a major factor influencing the function of savanna ecosystems, this work focused on the close inter-connection between water relations and carbon fluxes. Data from a nine-month measuring campaign lasting from the early wet season to the late dry season were used.

Total ecosystem respiration showed highest values at the onset of the growing season, a slightly lower plateau during the main part of the growing season and a continuous decrease during the transition towards the dry season.

The regulation of canopy conductance was changed in two ways: changes due to phenology during the course of the growing season and short-term acclimation to soil water conditions.

The most constant parameter was water use efficiency that was influenced by VPD during the day but the VPD response curve of water usage did change only slightly during the course of the growing season and decreased by about 30% during the transition from wet to dry season.

The regulation of canopy conductance and photosynthetic capacity were closely related. This observation meets recent leaf-level findings that stomatal closure triggers down-regulation of Rubisco during drought. Our results may show the effects of these processes on the ecosystem scale.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation