Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 17, issue 4
Articles | Volume 17, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1147-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1147-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 4
Research article
 | 
28 Feb 2020
Research article |  | 28 Feb 2020

African biomes are most sensitive to changes in CO2 under recent and near-future CO2 conditions

Simon Scheiter, Glenn R. Moncrieff, Mirjam Pfeiffer, and Steven I. Higgins

Viewed

Total article views: 2,552 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,867 639 46 2,552 161 43 39
  • HTML: 1,867
  • PDF: 639
  • XML: 46
  • Total: 2,552
  • Supplement: 161
  • BibTeX: 43
  • EndNote: 39
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Oct 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Oct 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,552 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,182 with geography defined and 370 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Current rates of climate and atmospheric change are likely higher than during the last millions of years. Vegetation cannot keep pace with these changes and lags behind climate. We used a vegetation model to study how these lags are influenced by CO2 and fire in Africa. Our results indicate that vegetation is most sensitive to CO2 change under current and near-future conditions and that vegetation will be committed to further change even if CO2 emissions are reduced and the climate stabilizes.
Read more
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint