Articles | Volume 16, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1829-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1829-2019
Research article
 | 
30 Apr 2019
Research article |  | 30 Apr 2019

How representative are FLUXNET measurements of surface fluxes during temperature extremes?

Sophie V. J. van der Horst, Andrew J. Pitman, Martin G. De Kauwe, Anna Ukkola, Gab Abramowitz, and Peter Isaac

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (18 Feb 2019) by Paul Stoy
AR by Andy Pitman on behalf of the Authors (12 Mar 2019)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (13 Mar 2019) by Paul Stoy
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (09 Apr 2019)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (09 Apr 2019) by Paul Stoy
AR by Andy Pitman on behalf of the Authors (10 Apr 2019)  Author's response   Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Measurements of surface fluxes are taken around the world and are extremely valuable for understanding how the land and atmopshere interact, and how the land can amplify temerature extremes. However, do these measurements sample extreme temperatures, or are they biased to the average? We examine this question and highlight data that do measure surface fluxes under extreme conditions. This provides a way forward to help model developers improve their models.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint