Dear Authors:
Thank you for uploading your reply comments to referee comments.
Both recommendations by the referees are acceptable after moderate revisions and therefore this manuscript can be a candidate for publication after appropriate revision. I agree that this Landscape-DNDC-based study is timely and implicative for climate and reactive nitrogen management. In particular, the referees evaluated that this manuscript has high (good to excellent) scientific significance and made no serious concern. I studied all the comments and overall your responses look adequate. Referee #2 recommended improvement of the manuscript structure, and you justified current one (first EFs and finally uncertainty). I agree with your decision for this point. However, for another recommendation (more clearly separate introduction, methods, results, and discussion), I expect that you consider further carefully. Correction of reference style is also greatly appreciated.

Dear authors:
Thank you for providing the revised manuscript and your response.
The manuscript became clearer and looks satisfactory.

Just a technical point:
Figure 1: Can you capitalize the first letter of each term (e.g., Climate, Management)?
This is done in other figures.