Articles | Volume 15, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6659-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6659-2018
Reviews and syntheses
 | 
09 Nov 2018
Reviews and syntheses |  | 09 Nov 2018

Reviews and syntheses: the GESAMP atmospheric iron deposition model intercomparison study

Stelios Myriokefalitakis, Akinori Ito, Maria Kanakidou, Athanasios Nenes, Maarten C. Krol, Natalie M. Mahowald, Rachel A. Scanza, Douglas S. Hamilton, Matthew S. Johnson, Nicholas Meskhidze, Jasper F. Kok, Cecile Guieu, Alex R. Baker, Timothy D. Jickells, Manmohan M. Sarin, Srinivas Bikkina, Rachel Shelley, Andrew Bowie, Morgane M. G. Perron, and Robert A. Duce

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (24 Sep 2018) by Maria Tzortziou
AR by Stylianos Myriokefalitakis on behalf of the Authors (03 Oct 2018)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (18 Oct 2018) by Maria Tzortziou
AR by Stylianos Myriokefalitakis on behalf of the Authors (24 Oct 2018)
Download
Short summary
The first atmospheric iron (Fe) deposition model intercomparison is presented in this study, as a result of the deliberations of the United Nations Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection (GESAMP; http://www.gesamp.org/) Working Group 38. We conclude that model diversity over remote oceans reflects uncertainty in the Fe content parameterizations of dust aerosols, combustion aerosol emissions and the size distribution of transported aerosol Fe.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint