Volume 14, issue 21 | Copyright
Biogeosciences, 14, 4829-4850, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4829-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 03 Nov 2017

Research article | 03 Nov 2017

Global consequences of afforestation and bioenergy cultivation on ecosystem service indicators

Andreas Krause et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 1,735 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,207 476 52 1,735 75 38 74
  • HTML: 1,207
  • PDF: 476
  • XML: 52
  • Total: 1,735
  • Supplement: 75
  • BibTeX: 38
  • EndNote: 74
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 May 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 May 2017)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 1,735 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,721 with geography defined and 14 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited
Saved (final revised paper)
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 21 Sep 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Many climate change mitigation scenarios require negative emissions from land management. However, environmental side effects are often not considered. Here, we use projections of future land use from two land-use models as input to a vegetation model. We show that carbon removal via bioenergy production or forest maintenance and expansion affect a range of ecosystem functions. Largest impacts are found for crop production, nitrogen losses, and emissions of biogenic volatile organic compounds.
Many climate change mitigation scenarios require negative emissions from land management....
Citation
Share