24 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Rotational and continuous grazing does not affect the total net ecosystem exchange of a pasture grazed by cattle but modifies CO2 exchange dynamics L. Gourlez de la Motte et al. 10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.011
2. Management practices during the renewal year affect the carbon balance of a boreal legume grassland Y. Li et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1158250
3. Temporal Dynamics of Nitrous Oxide Emission and Nitrate Leaching in Renovated Grassland with Repeated Application of Manure and/or Chemical Fertilizer A. Nagatake et al. 10.3390/atmos9120485
4. Denitrifiers and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from a Subtropical Vegetable Cropland S. Jhang et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00106
5. Are there memory effects on greenhouse gas emissions (CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub>) following grassland restoration? L. Merbold et al. 10.5194/bg-18-1481-2021
6. An evaluation of four years of nitrous oxide fluxes after application of ammonium nitrate and urea fertilisers measured using the eddy covariance method N. Cowan et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107812
7. Nitrogen use efficiency and N<sub>2</sub>O and NH<sub>3</sub> losses attributed to three fertiliser types applied to an intensively managed silage crop N. Cowan et al. 10.5194/bg-16-4731-2019
8. Improved gap filling approach and uncertainty estimation for eddy covariance N2O fluxes J. Goodrich et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108280
9. Nitrous oxide fluxes over establishing biofuel crops: Characterization of temporal variability using the cross‐wavelet analysis M. Zeri et al. 10.1111/gcbb.12728
10. Paddock-scale carbon and greenhouse gas budgets in the first year following the renewal of an intensively grazed perennial pasture A. Wall et al. 10.1016/j.still.2023.105814
11. The Nitrification Inhibitor Vizura® Reduces N2O Emissions When Added to Digestate before Injection under Irrigated Maize in the Po Valley (Northern Italy) M. Chiodini et al. 10.3390/agronomy9080431
12. Effect of management and weather variations on the greenhouse gas budget of two grasslands during a 10-year experiment C. Ammann et al. 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106814
13. Effects of climate change in European croplands and grasslands: productivity, greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon storage M. Carozzi et al. 10.5194/bg-19-3021-2022
14. Mitigation of nitrous oxide emissions in the context of nitrogen loss reduction from agroecosystems: managing hot spots and hot moments C. Wagner-Riddle et al. 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.002
15. Nitrous oxide flux observed with tall-tower eddy covariance over a heterogeneous rice cultivation landscape Y. Xie et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152210
16. Challenges in Scaling Up Greenhouse Gas Fluxes: Experience From the UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Feedbacks Program P. Levy et al. 10.1029/2021JG006743
17. N2O Emissions From Two Agroecosystems: High Spatial Variability and Long Pulses Observed Using Static Chambers and the Flux‐Gradient Technique S. Waldo et al. 10.1029/2019JG005032
18. Two contrasting years of continuous N2O and CO2fluxes on a shallow-peated drained agricultural boreal peatland S. Gerin et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109630
19. Soil mineral N dynamics and N 2 O emissions following grassland renewal C. Buchen et al. 10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.013
20. Two Contrasting Years of Continuous N2o and Co2 Fluxes on a Shallow Drained Agricultural Boreal Peatland S. Gerin et al. 10.2139/ssrn.4177973
21. Nitrous oxide emission factors from an intensively grazed temperate grassland: A comparison of cumulative emissions determined by eddy covariance and static chamber methods R. Murphy et al. 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107725
22. Nitrous oxide fluxes determined by continuous eddy covariance measurements from intensively grazed pastures: Temporal patterns and environmental controls L. Liang et al. 10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.010
23. Temperate grazed grassland carbon balances for two adjacent paddocks determined separately from one eddy covariance system A. Wall et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107942
24. N2O Emissions Mitigation in Acidic Soil Following Biochar Application Under Different Moisture Regimes M. Aamer et al. 10.1007/s42729-020-00311-0