Journal cover Journal topic
Biogeosciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
Volume 13, issue 16
Biogeosciences, 13, 4627–4635, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4627-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Biogeosciences, 13, 4627–4635, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4627-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 17 Aug 2016

Research article | 17 Aug 2016

Stand structural diversity rather than species diversity enhances aboveground carbon storage in secondary subtropical forests in Eastern China

Arshad Ali1,2,3, En-Rong Yan1,2,3, Han Y. H. Chen4, Scott X. Chang5, Yan-Tao Zhao1,2,3, Xiao-Dong Yang1,2,3, and Ming-Shan Xu1,2,3 Arshad Ali et al.
  • 1School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
  • 2Forest Ecosystem Research and Observation Station in Putuo Island, Zhoushan, Zhejiang 316100, China
  • 3Tiantong National Forest Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315114, China
  • 4Faculty of Natural Resources Management, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay ON P7B 5E1, Canada
  • 5Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada

Abstract. Stand structural diversity, typically characterized by variances in tree diameter at breast height (DBH) and total height, plays a critical role in influencing aboveground carbon (C) storage. However, few studies have considered the multivariate relationships of aboveground C storage with stand age, stand structural diversity, and species diversity in natural forests. In this study, aboveground C storage, stand age, tree species, DBH and height diversity indices, were determined across 80 subtropical forest plots in Eastern China. We employed structural equation modelling (SEM) to test for the direct and indirect effects of stand structural diversity, species diversity, and stand age on aboveground C storage. The three final SEMs with different directions for the path between species diversity and stand structural diversity had a similar goodness of fit to the data. They accounted for 82 % of the variation in aboveground C storage, 55–59 % of the variation in stand structural diversity, and 0.1 to 9 % of the variation in species diversity. Stand age demonstrated strong positive total effects, including a positive direct effect (β =  0.41), and a positive indirect effect via stand structural diversity (β =  0.41) on aboveground C storage. Stand structural diversity had a positive direct effect on aboveground C storage (β =  0.56), whereas there was little total effect of species diversity as it had a negative direct association with, but had a positive indirect effect, via stand structural diversity, on aboveground C storage. The negligible total effect of species diversity on aboveground C storage in the forests under study may have been attributable to competitive exclusion with high aboveground biomass, or a historical logging preference for productive species. Our analyses suggested that stand structural diversity was a major determinant for variations in aboveground C storage in the secondary subtropical forests in Eastern China. Hence, maintaining tree DBH and height diversity through silvicultural operations might constitute an effective approach for enhancing aboveground C storage in these forests.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Stand age demonstrated strong positive total effects, including a positive direct effect (β = 0.41), and a positive indirect effect via stand structural diversity (β = 0.41) on aboveground carbon (C) storage. Stand structural diversity had a positive direct effect on aboveground C storage (β = 0.56), whereas there was little total effect of species diversity as it had a negative direct association with, but had a positive indirect effect, via stand structural diversity, on aboveground C storage.
Stand age demonstrated strong positive total effects, including a positive direct effect (β =...
Citation