Journal cover Journal topic
Biogeosciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
Volume 13, issue 12
Biogeosciences, 13, 3757-3776, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3757-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Biogeosciences, 13, 3757-3776, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3757-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 29 Jun 2016

Research article | 29 Jun 2016

Combining livestock production information in a process-based vegetation model to reconstruct the history of grassland management

Jinfeng Chang1,2, Philippe Ciais1, Mario Herrero3, Petr Havlik4, Matteo Campioli5, Xianzhou Zhang6, Yongfei Bai7, Nicolas Viovy1, Joanna Joiner8, Xuhui Wang9,10, Shushi Peng10, Chao Yue1,11, Shilong Piao10, Tao Wang12,13, Didier A. Hauglustaine1, Jean-Francois Soussana14, Anna Peregon1,15, Natalya Kosykh15, and Nina Mironycheva-Tokareva15 Jinfeng Chang et al.
  • 1Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, UMR8212, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 2Sorbonne Universités (UPMC), CNRS-IRD-MNHN, LOCEAN/IPSL, 4 place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France
  • 3Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Agriculture Flagship, St. Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia
  • 4Ecosystems Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2361 Laxenburg, Austria
  • 5Centre of Excellence PLECO (Plant and Vegetation Ecology), Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
  • 6Lhasa Plateau Ecosystem Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, 100101 Beijing, China
  • 7State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100093 Beijing, China
  • 8NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
  • 9Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Institute Pierre Simon Laplace, 75005 Paris, France
  • 10Sino-French Institute of Earth System Sciences, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, China
  • 11CNRS and UJF Grenoble 1, UMR5183, Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l'Environnement (LGGE), Grenoble, France
  • 12Key Laboratory of Alpine Ecology and Biodiversity, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100085 Beijing, China
  • 13CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100085 Beijing, China
  • 14INRA, UAR0233 CODIR Collège de Direction. Centre-Siège de l'INRA, Paris, France
  • 15Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry, Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), Pr. Akademika Lavrentyeva 8/2, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia

Abstract. Grassland management type (grazed or mown) and intensity (intensive or extensive) play a crucial role in the greenhouse gas balance and surface energy budget of this biome, both at field scale and at large spatial scale. However, global gridded historical information on grassland management intensity is not available. Combining modelled grass-biomass productivity with statistics of the grass-biomass demand by livestock, we reconstruct gridded maps of grassland management intensity from 1901 to 2012. These maps include the minimum area of managed vs. maximum area of unmanaged grasslands and the fraction of mown vs. grazed area at a resolution of 0.5° by 0.5°. The grass-biomass demand is derived from a livestock dataset for 2000, extended to cover the period 1901–2012. The grass-biomass supply (i.e. forage grass from mown grassland and biomass grazed) is simulated by the process-based model ORCHIDEE-GM driven by historical climate change, risingCO2 concentration, and changes in nitrogen fertilization. The global area of managed grassland obtained in this study increases from 6.1 × 106km2 in 1901 to 12.3 × 106km2 in 2000, although the expansion pathway varies between different regions. ORCHIDEE-GM also simulated augmentation in global mean productivity and herbage-use efficiency over managed grassland during the 20th century, indicating a general intensification of grassland management at global scale but with regional differences. The gridded grassland management intensity maps are model dependent because they depend on modelled productivity. Thus specific attention was given to the evaluation of modelled productivity against a series of observations from site-level net primary productivity (NPP) measurements to two global satellite products of gross primary productivity (GPP) (MODIS-GPP and SIF data). Generally, ORCHIDEE-GM captures the spatial pattern, seasonal cycle, and interannual variability of grassland productivity at global scale well and thus is appropriate for global applications presented here.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We derived the global maps of grassland management intensity of 1901–2012, including the minimum area of managed grassland with fraction of mown/grazed part. These maps, to our knowledge for the first time, provide global, time-dependent information for drawing up global estimates of management impact on biomass production and yields and for global vegetation models to enable simulations of carbon stocks and GHG budgets beyond simple tuning of grassland productivities to account for management.
We derived the global maps of grassland management intensity of 1901–2012, including the minimum...
Citation
Share