36 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. An integrated stratigraphic study across the Santonian/Campanian boundary at Bocieniec, southern Poland: A new boundary stratotype candidate Z. Dubicka et al. 10.1016/j.cretres.2017.07.012
2. Calcification of an estuarine coccolithophore increases with ocean acidification when subjected to diurnally fluctuating carbonate chemistry M. White et al. 10.3354/meps12639
3. Understanding Bulk Sediment Stable Isotope Records in the Eastern Equatorial Pacific, From Seven Million Years Ago to Present Day D. Reghellin et al. 10.1029/2019PA003586
4. Size-dependent dynamics of the internal carbon pool drive isotopic vital effects in calcifying phytoplankton N. Chauhan & R. Rickaby 10.1016/j.gca.2024.03.033
5. Carbon isotope ratios of coccolith–associated polysaccharides of Emiliania huxleyi as a function of growth rate and CO2 concentration E. Wilkes et al. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.02.006
6. Calibration of shell δ18O from the common whelk Buccinum undatum highlights potential for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction P. Hollyman et al. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.109995
7. Technical note: A refinement of coccolith separation methods: measuring the sinking characteristics of coccoliths H. Zhang et al. 10.5194/bg-15-4759-2018
8. Environmental carbonate chemistry selects for phenotype of recently isolated strains of Emiliania huxleyi R. Rickaby et al. 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.02.010
9. The history of calcite diagenesis and origin of exceptionally negative oxygen isotope values in chalks of the Niobrara Formation, Denver Basin, USA R. Simon et al. 10.1002/dep2.218
10. Environmental controls on the growth, photosynthetic and calcification rates of a Southern Hemisphere strain of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi Y. Feng et al. 10.1002/lno.10442
11. Physiological control on carbon isotope fractionation in marine phytoplankton K. Brandenburg et al. 10.5194/bg-19-3305-2022
12. Stable carbon isotope signals in particulate organic and inorganic carbon of coccolithophores – A numerical model study for Emiliania huxleyi L. Holtz et al. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.030
13. Laboratory-grown coccoliths exhibit no vital effect in clumped isotope (Δ47) composition on a range of geologically relevant temperatures A. Katz et al. 10.1016/j.gca.2017.02.025
14. Geochemistry of Campanian–Maastrichtian brachiopods from the Rørdal-1 core (Denmark): Differential responses to environmental change and diagenesis R. Harlou et al. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.08.039
15. Enhancing Our Palaeoceanographic Toolbox Using Paired Foraminiferal and Coccolith Calcite Measurements From Pelagic Sequences M. Hermoso et al. 10.3389/feart.2020.00038
16. Constraining the magnitude of the carbon isotope excursion during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum using larger benthic foraminifera Q. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.103049
17. Isotopic record of Pleistocene glacial/interglacial cycles in pelagic carbonates: Revisiting historical data from the Caribbean Sea M. Hermoso 10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.02.003
18. Evolutionary driven of Gephyrocapsa coccolith isotopic vital effects over the past 400 ka X. Jin et al. 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.09.010
19. A coastal coccolithophore maintains pH homeostasis and switches carbon sources in response to ocean acidification Y. Liu et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-04463-7
20. The DIC carbon isotope evolutions during CO2 bubbling: Implications for ocean acidification laboratory culture H. Zhang et al. 10.3389/fmars.2022.1045634
21. Stable C and O isotopic study of the Campanian chalk from the Mielnik section (eastern Poland): Signals from bulk rock, belemnites, benthic foraminifera, nannofossils and microcrystalline cements M. Bojanowski et al. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.10.032
22. Re-examining extreme carbon isotope fractionation in the coccolithophore Ochrosphaera neapolitana H. Zhang et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-35109-4
23. A New Method to Speed Up Nannofossil Picking for Monospecific Geochemical Analyses M. Bordiga et al. 10.3390/jmse10121829
24. An explanation for the 18O excess in Noelaerhabdaceae coccolith calcite M. Hermoso et al. 10.1016/j.gca.2016.06.016
25. Eocene emergence of highly calcifying coccolithophores despite declining atmospheric CO2 L. Claxton et al. 10.1038/s41561-022-01006-0
26. Upregulation of phytoplankton carbon concentrating mechanisms during low CO2 glacial periods and implications for the phytoplankton pCO2 proxy H. Stoll et al. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.01.012
27. Equatorial heat accumulation as a long-term trigger of permanent Antarctic ice sheets during the Cenozoic M. Tremblin et al. 10.1073/pnas.1608100113
28. The Early to Middle Eocene Transition: An Integrated Calcareous Nannofossil and Stable Isotope Record From the Northwest Atlantic Ocean (Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Site U1410) C. Cappelli et al. 10.1029/2019PA003686
29. Towards the use of the coccolith vital effects in palaeoceanography: A field investigation during the middle Miocene in the SW Pacific Ocean M. Hermoso et al. 10.1016/j.dsr.2020.103262
30. Morphology, phylogenetic position, and ecophysiological features of the coccolithophore Chrysotila dentata (Prymnesiophyceae) isolated from the Bohai Sea, China H. Liu et al. 10.1080/00318884.2019.1644477
31. Parallel between the isotopic composition of coccolith calcite and carbon levels across Termination II: developing a new paleo-CO<sub>2</sub> probe C. Godbillot et al. 10.5194/cp-18-449-2022
32. The origin of carbon isotope vital effects in coccolith calcite H. McClelland et al. 10.1038/ncomms14511
33. An isotope label method for empirical detection of carbonic anhydrase in the calcification pathway of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi H. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.gca.2020.09.008
34. The effect of salinity on the biogeochemistry of the coccolithophores with implications for coccolith-based isotopic proxies M. Hermoso & M. Lecasble 10.5194/bg-15-6761-2018
35. Constraints on coccolithophores under ocean acidification obtained from boron and carbon geochemical approaches Y. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.gca.2021.09.025
36. Increased Biogenic Calcification and Burial Under Elevated pCO2 During the Miocene: A Model‐Data Comparison W. Si et al. 10.1029/2022GB007541