Journal cover Journal topic
Biogeosciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
Volume 13, issue 4
Biogeosciences, 13, 1329-1339, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1329-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Biogeosciences, 13, 1329-1339, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1329-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 02 Mar 2016

Research article | 02 Mar 2016

Evaluation of wetland methane emissions across North America using atmospheric data and inverse modeling

Scot M. Miller1,a, Roisin Commane2, Joe R. Melton3, Arlyn E. Andrews4, Joshua Benmergui2, Edward J. Dlugokencky4, Greet Janssens-Maenhout5, Anna M. Michalak6, Colm Sweeney7, and Doug E. J. Worthy8 Scot M. Miller et al.
  • 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • 2School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • 3Climate Processes Section, Environment Canada, Victoria, Canada
  • 4Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 5Institute for Environment and Sustainability, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy
  • 6Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, USA
  • 7Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 8Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada
  • anow at: Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, USA

Abstract. Existing estimates of methane (CH4) fluxes from North American wetlands vary widely in both magnitude and distribution. In light of these differences, this study uses atmospheric CH4 observations from the US and Canada to analyze seven different bottom-up, wetland CH4 estimates reported in a recent model comparison project. We first use synthetic data to explore whether wetland CH4 fluxes are detectable at atmospheric observation sites. We find that the observation network can detect aggregate wetland fluxes from both eastern and western Canada but generally not from the US. Based upon these results, we then use real data and inverse modeling results to analyze the magnitude, seasonality, and spatial distribution of each model estimate. The magnitude of Canadian fluxes in many models is larger than indicated by atmospheric observations. Many models predict a seasonality that is narrower than implied by inverse modeling results, possibly indicating an oversensitivity to air or soil temperatures. The LPJ-Bern and SDGVM models have a geographic distribution that is most consistent with atmospheric observations, depending upon the region and season. These models utilize land cover maps or dynamic modeling to estimate wetland coverage while most other models rely primarily on remote sensing inundation data.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We use atmospheric data from the US and Canada to examine seven wetland methane flux estimates. Relative to existing estimates, we find a methane source that is smaller in magnitude with a broader seasonal cycle. Furthermore, we estimate the largest fluxes over the Hudson Bay Lowlands, a spatial distribution that differs from commonly used remote sensing estimates of wetland location.
We use atmospheric data from the US and Canada to examine seven wetland methane flux estimates....
Citation
Share