Journal cover Journal topic
Biogeosciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
Volume 12, issue 11
Biogeosciences, 12, 3623–3638, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3623-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Biogeosciences, 12, 3623–3638, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3623-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 11 Jun 2015

Research article | 11 Jun 2015

Understanding emissions of ammonia from buildings and the application of fertilizers: an example from Poland

M. Werner et al.

Related authors

Spatial, temporal and vertical distribution of ammonia concentrations over Europe – comparing a static and dynamic approach with WRF-Chem
M. Werner, M. Kryza, C. Geels, T. Ellermann, and C. Ambelas Skjøth
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-22935-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-22935-2015, 2015
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Air - Land Exchange
Distinguishing between early- and late-covering crops in the land surface model Noah-MP: impact on simulated surface energy fluxes and temperature
Kristina Bohm, Joachim Ingwersen, Josipa Milovac, and Thilo Streck
Biogeosciences, 17, 2791–2805, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2791-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2791-2020, 2020
A robust data cleaning procedure for eddy covariance flux measurements
Domenico Vitale, Gerardo Fratini, Massimo Bilancia, Giacomo Nicolini, Simone Sabbatini, and Dario Papale
Biogeosciences, 17, 1367–1391, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1367-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1367-2020, 2020
Short summary
Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe: synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach
Martin Jung, Christopher Schwalm, Mirco Migliavacca, Sophia Walther, Gustau Camps-Valls, Sujan Koirala, Peter Anthoni, Simon Besnard, Paul Bodesheim, Nuno Carvalhais, Frédéric Chevallier, Fabian Gans, Daniel S. Goll, Vanessa Haverd, Philipp Köhler, Kazuhito Ichii, Atul K. Jain, Junzhi Liu, Danica Lombardozzi, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Jacob A. Nelson, Michael O'Sullivan, Martijn Pallandt, Dario Papale, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Christian Rödenbeck, Stephen Sitch, Gianluca Tramontana, Anthony Walker, Ulrich Weber, and Markus Reichstein
Biogeosciences, 17, 1343–1365, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1343-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1343-2020, 2020
Short summary
Leveraging the signature of heterotrophic respiration on atmospheric CO2 for model benchmarking
Samantha J. Basile, Xin Lin, William R. Wieder, Melannie D. Hartman, and Gretchen Keppel-Aleks
Biogeosciences, 17, 1293–1308, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1293-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1293-2020, 2020
Short summary
Estimating causal networks in biosphere–atmosphere interaction with the PCMCI approach
Christopher Krich, Jakob Runge, Diego G. Miralles, Mirco Migliavacca, Oscar Perez-Priego, Tarek El-Madany, Arnaud Carrara, and Miguel D. Mahecha
Biogeosciences, 17, 1033–1061, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1033-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1033-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Andersen, H. V, Hovmand, M. F., Hummelshøj, P., and Jensen, N. O.: Measurements of ammonia concentrations, fluxes and dry deposition velocities to a spruce forest 1991–1995, Atmos. Environ., 33, 1367–1383, 1999.
Anderson, N., Strader, R., and Davidson, C.: Airborne reduced nitrogen: ammonia emissions from agriculture and other sources, Environ. Int., 29, 277–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00186-1, 2003.
Asman, W. A. H., Sutton, M. A., and Schjorring, J. K.: Ammonia: emission, atmospheric transport and deposition, New Phytol., 139, 27–48, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00180.x, 1998.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
A Europe-wide dynamic ammonia emissions model has been applied for one of the largest agricultural countries in Europe, and its sensitivity on the distribution of emissions among different agricultural functions was analysed. The results suggest that the dynamic emission model is most sensitive to emission from animal manure, in particular how this is connected to national regulations. In contrast, the model is most robust with respect to emission from buildings and storage.
A Europe-wide dynamic ammonia emissions model has been applied for one of the largest...
Citation