Journal cover Journal topic
Biogeosciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
Volume 12, issue 8
Biogeosciences, 12, 2311–2326, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2311-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Biogeosciences, 12, 2311–2326, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2311-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 17 Apr 2015

Research article | 17 Apr 2015

On the use of the post-closure methods uncertainty band to evaluate the performance of land surface models against eddy covariance flux data

J. Ingwersen et al.
Download
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Joachim Ingwersen on behalf of the Authors (16 Mar 2015)  Author's response
ED: Publish as is (19 Mar 2015) by Trevor Keenan
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The energy balance of eddy covariance (EC) flux data is normally not closed. Therefore, EC flux data are usually post-closed, i.e. the measured turbulent fluxes are adjusted so as to close the energy balance. We propose to use in model evaluation the post-closure method uncertainty band (PUB) to account for the uncertainty in EC data originating from lacking energy balance closure. Working with only a single post-closing method might result in severe misinterpretations in model-data comparison.
The energy balance of eddy covariance (EC) flux data is normally not closed. Therefore, EC flux...
Citation