Journal cover Journal topic
Biogeosciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
Volume 11, issue 7
Biogeosciences, 11, 1873–1897, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1873-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Biogeosciences, 11, 1873–1897, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1873-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 08 Apr 2014

Research article | 08 Apr 2014

Do we (need to) care about canopy radiation schemes in DGVMs? Caveats and potential impacts

A. Loew1, P. M. van Bodegom2, J.-L. Widlowski3, J. Otto4, T. Quaife5, B. Pinty3, and T. Raddatz1 A. Loew et al.
  • 1Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
  • 2VU University Amsterdam, Department of Ecological Science, Subdepartment of Systems Ecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • 3European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy
  • 4Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et l'Environnement (LSCE), CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 5Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading, UK

Abstract. Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) are an essential part of current state-of-the-art Earth system models. In recent years, the complexity of DGVMs has increased by incorporating new important processes like, e.g., nutrient cycling and land cover dynamics, while biogeophysical processes like surface radiation have not been developed much further. Canopy radiation models are however very important for the estimation of absorption and reflected fluxes and are essential for a proper estimation of surface carbon, energy and water fluxes.

The present study provides an overview of current implementations of canopy radiation schemes in a couple of state-of-the-art DGVMs and assesses their accuracy in simulating canopy absorption and reflection for a variety of different surface conditions. Systematic deviations in surface albedo and fractions of absorbed photosynthetic active radiation (faPAR) are identified and potential impacts are assessed.

The results show clear deviations for both, absorbed and reflected, surface solar radiation fluxes. FaPAR is typically underestimated, which results in an underestimation of gross primary productivity (GPP) for the investigated cases. The deviation can be as large as 25% in extreme cases. Deviations in surface albedo range between −0.15 ≤ Δα ≤ 0.36, with a slight positive bias on the order of Δα ≈ 0.04. Potential radiative forcing caused by albedo deviations is estimated at −1.25 ≤ RF ≤ −0.8 (W m−2), caused by neglect of the diurnal cycle of surface albedo.

The present study is the first one that provides an assessment of canopy RT schemes in different currently used DGVMs together with an assessment of the potential impact of the identified deviations. The paper illustrates that there is a general need to improve the canopy radiation schemes in DGVMs and provides different perspectives for their improvement.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation