Journal cover Journal topic
Biogeosciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
Volume 10, issue 9 | Copyright

Special issue: How changes in ice cover, permafrost and UV radiation impact...

Biogeosciences, 10, 5911-5929, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5911-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 10 Sep 2013

Research article | 10 Sep 2013

Multivariate benthic ecosystem functioning in the Arctic – benthic fluxes explained by environmental parameters in the southeastern Beaufort Sea

H. Link1, G. Chaillou2, A. Forest3, D. Piepenburg4, and P. Archambault1 H. Link et al.
  • 1Institut des Sciences de la Mer, Université du Québec à Rimouski, G5L 3A1 Rimouski, Canada
  • 2Canada Research Chair in the Geochemistry of Coastal Hydrogeosystems, Department of Biology, Chemistry and Geography, Université du Québec à Rimouski, G5L 3A1 Rimouski, Canada
  • 3Takuvik Joint International Laboratory, UMI3376, Université Laval (Canada) – CNRS (France), Département de Biologie and Québec-Océan, Université Laval, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
  • 4Mainz Academy of Sciences, the Humanities and Literature, c/o Institute for Polar Ecology of the University of Kiel, 24148 Kiel, Germany

Abstract. The effects of climate change on Arctic marine ecosystems and their biogeochemical cycles are difficult to predict given the complex physical, biological and chemical interactions among the ecosystem components. We studied benthic biogeochemical fluxes in the Arctic and the influence of short-term (seasonal to annual), long-term (annual to decadal) and other environmental variability on their spatial distribution to provide a baseline for estimates of the impact of future changes. In summer 2009, we measured fluxes of dissolved oxygen, nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, soluble reactive phosphate and silicic acid at the sediment–water interface at eight sites in the southeastern Beaufort Sea at water depths from 45 to 580 m. The spatial pattern of the measured benthic boundary fluxes was heterogeneous. Multivariate analysis of flux data showed that no single or reduced combination of fluxes could explain the majority of spatial variation, indicating that oxygen flux is not representative of other nutrient sink–source dynamics. We tested the influence of eight environmental parameters on single benthic fluxes. Short-term environmental parameters (sinking flux of particulate organic carbon above the bottom, sediment surface Chl a) were most important for explaining oxygen, ammonium and nitrate fluxes. Long-term parameters (porosity, surface manganese and iron concentration, bottom water oxygen concentrations) together with δ13Corg signature explained most of the spatial variation in phosphate, nitrate and nitrite fluxes. Variation in pigments at the sediment surface was most important to explain variation in fluxes of silicic acid. In a model including all fluxes synchronously, the overall spatial distribution could be best explained (57%) by the combination of sediment Chl a, phaeopigments, δ13Corg, surficial manganese and bottom water oxygen concentration. We conclude that it is necessary to consider long-term environmental variability along with rapidly ongoing environmental changes to predict the flux of oxygen and nutrients across Arctic sediments even at short timescales. Our results contribute to improve ecological models predicting the impact of climate change on the functioning of marine ecosystems.

Download & links
Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Citation
Share