1Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
2Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA
3Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy
4Research Station for Norway Spruce Silviculture, Forest Research and Management Institute-ICAS, Campulung Moldovonesc, Romania
5Forest Ecology and Ecophysiology Unit, UMR INRA UHP, Champenoux, France
Received: 21 Sep 2010 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 19 Oct 2010
Abstract. The allocation of carbon (C) taken up by the tree canopy for respiration and production of tree organs with different construction and maintenance costs, life span and decomposition rate, crucially affects the residence time of C in forests and their C cycling rate. The carbon-use efficiency, or ratio between net primary production (NPP) and gross primary production (GPP), represents a convenient way to analyse the C allocation at the stand level. In this study, we extend the current knowledge on the NPP-GPP ratio in forests by assessing the temporal variability of the NPP-GPP ratio at interannual (for 8 years) and seasonal (for 1 year) scales for a young temperate beech stand, reporting dynamics for both leaves and woody organs, in particular stems. NPP was determined with biometric methods/litter traps, whereas the GPP was estimated via the eddy covariance micrometeorological technique.
Revised: 05 Aug 2011 – Accepted: 05 Aug 2011 – Published: 06 Sep 2011
The interannual variability of the proportion of C allocated to leaf NPP, wood NPP and leaf plus wood NPP (on average 11% yr−1, 29% yr−1 and 39% yr−1, respectively) was significant among years with up to 12% yr−1 variation in NPP-GPP ratio. Studies focusing on the comparison of NPP-GPP ratio among forests and models using fixed allocation schemes should take into account the possibility of such relevant interannual variability. Multiple linear regressions indicated that the NPP-GPP ratio of leaves and wood significantly correlated with environmental conditions. Previous year drought and air temperature explained about half of the NPP-GPP variability of leaves and wood, respectively, whereas the NPP-GPP ratio was not decreased by severe drought, with large NPP-GPP ratio on 2003 due mainly to low GPP. During the period between early May and mid June, the majority of GPP was allocated to leaf and stem NPP, whereas these sinks were of little importance later on. Improved estimation of seasonal GPP and of the contribution of previous-year reserves to stem growth, as well as reduction of data uncertainty, will be of relevance to increase the accuracy of the seasonal assessment of the NPP-GPP ratio in forests.
Campioli, M., Gielen, B., Göckede, M., Papale, D., Bouriaud, O., and Granier, A.: Temporal variability of the NPP-GPP ratio at seasonal and interannual time scales in a temperate beech forest, Biogeosciences, 8, 2481-2492, doi:10.5194/bg-8-2481-2011, 2011.