<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.biogeosciences.net/inc/bg/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Biogeosciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.biogeosciences.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1726-4170</issn>
		<eissn>1726-4189</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<issue_number>8</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/bg-6-1591-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.biogeosciences.net/6/1591/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.biogeosciences.net/6/1591/2009/bg-6-1591-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.biogeosciences.net/6/1591/2009/bg-6-1591-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>1591</start_page>
	<end_page>1601</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-08-10</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Using satellite-derived backscattering coefficients in addition to chlorophyll data to constrain a simple marine biogeochemical model</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>H. Kettle</name>
			<email>helen@bioss.ac.uk</email>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">The School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Now at: Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland, James Clerk Maxwell Building, The Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, UK</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Biogeochemical models of the ocean carbon cycle are frequently validated by,
or tuned to, satellite chlorophyll data. However, ocean carbon cycle models
are required to accurately model the movement of carbon, not chlorophyll, and
due to the high variability of the carbon to chlorophyll ratio in
phytoplankton, chlorophyll is not a robust proxy for carbon. Using inherent
optical property (IOP) inversion algorithms it is now possible to also derive
the amount of light backscattered by the upper ocean (&lt;i&gt;b&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;) which is related
to the amount of particulate organic carbon (POC) present. Using empirical
relationships between POC and &lt;i&gt;b&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, a 1-D marine biogeochemical model is
used to simulate &lt;i&gt;b&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; at 490 nm thereby allowing the model to be compared
with both remotely-sensed chlorophyll or &lt;i&gt;b&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; data. Here I investigate the
possibility of using &lt;i&gt;b&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; in conjunction with chlorophyll data to help
constrain the parameters in a simple 1-D NPZD model. The parameters of the
biogeochemical model are tuned with a genetic algorithm, so that the model is
fitted to either chlorophyll data or to both chlorophyll and &lt;i&gt;b&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; data at
three sites in the Atlantic with very different characteristics. Several
inherent optical property (IOP) algorithms are available for estimating
&lt;i&gt;b&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, three of which are used here. The effect of the different &lt;i&gt;b&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
datasets on the behaviour of the tuned model is examined to ascertain whether
the uncertainty in &lt;i&gt;b&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; is significant. The results show that the addition
of &lt;i&gt;b&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; data does not consistently alter the same model parameters at each
site and in fact can lead to some parameters becoming less well constrained,
implying there is still much work to be done on the mechanisms relating
chlorophyll to POC and &lt;i&gt;b&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; within the model. However, this study does
indicate that including &lt;i&gt;b&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; data has the potential to significantly effect
the modelled mixed layer detritus and that uncertainties in &lt;i&gt;b&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; due to the
different IOP algorithms are not particularly significant.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Bricaud, A., Morel, A., Babin, M., Allali, K., and Claustre, H.: Variations of light absorption by suspended particles with chlorophyll-$a$ concentration in oceanic (case 1) waters. Analysis and implications for bio-optical models, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 31 033–31 044, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Burchard, H., Bolding, K., and Villarreal, M R.: GOTM – a general ocean turbulence model. theory, applications and test cases, Tech. Rep. EUR 18745 EN, European Commission, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Carroll, D L.: Chemical Laser Modeling with Genetic Algorithms, AIAA, 34(2), 338–346, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Claustre, H., Morel, A., Babin, M., Cailliau, C., Marie, D., Marty, J.-C., Tailliez, D., and Vaulot, D.: Variability in particle attenuation and chlorophyll fluorescence in the tropical Pacific: Scales, patterns, and biogeochemical implications, J. Geophys. Res., 104(C2), 3401–3422, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Cloern, J E., Grenz, C., and Vidergar-Lucas, L.: An empirical model of the phytoplankton chlorophyll:carbon ratio – the conversion factor between productivity and growth rate, Limnol. Oceanogr., 40(7), 1313–1321, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Fennel, K., Losch, M., Schröter, J., and Wenzel, M.: Testing a marine ecosystem model: sensitivity analysis and parameter optimization, J. Marine Syst., 28, 45-63, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Fujii, M., Boss, E., and Chai, F.: The value of adding optics to ecosystem models: a case study, Biogeosciences, 4, 817–835, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Garver, S A. and Siegel, D A.: Inherent optical property inversion of ocean color spectra and its biogeochemical interpretation: I. Time series from the Sargasso Sea, J. Geopys. Res., 102, 18607–18625, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Geider, R J., MacIntyre, H L., and Kana, T.: Dynamic model of phytoplankton growth and acclimation: responses of the balanced growth rate and the chlorophyll-$a$: carbon ratio to light, nutrient-limitation and temperature, Ecol. Prog. Ser., 148, 187–200, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Goldberg, D.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Kettle, H. and Merchant, C J.: Modeling ocean primary production: sensitivity to spectral resolution of attenuation and absorption of light, Progr. Oceanogr., 78(2), 135, \doi10.1016/j.pocean.2008.04.002, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Krishnakumar, K.: Micro-genetic algorithms for stationary and non-stationary function optimization, Intel. Control and Adaptive Syst., 1196, 289–296, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Lee, Z., Carder, K., and Arnone, R.: Deriving inherent optical properties from water color: A multi-band quasi-analytical algorithm for optically deep waters, Appl. Optics, 41, 5755–5772, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Levitus, S., Conkright, M., Reid, J., Najjar, R., and Mantyla, A.: Distributon of nitrate, phosphate and silicate in the world oceans, Prog. Oceangr., 31, 245–273, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Loisel, H. and Poteau, A.: Inversion of IOP based on R$_rs$ and remotely retrieved $K_d$, IOCCG. Remote Sensing of Inherent Optical Properties: Fundamentals, Tests of Algorithms, and Applications. Lee, Z-P (ed), Reports of the International Ocean-Colour Coordinating Group, No. 5, IOCCG, Dartmouth, Canada, 35–41, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Loisel, H. and Stramski, D.: Estimation of the inherent optical properties of natural waters from the irradiance attenuation coefficient and reflectance in the presence of Raman scattering, Appl. Opt,, 39(18), 3001–3011, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Loisel, H., Stramski, D., Mitchell, B., Fell, F., Fournier-Sicre, V., Lemasle, B., and Babin, M.: Comparison of the ocean inherent optical properties obtained from measurements and inverse modelling, Appl. Optics, 40(15), 2384–2397, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Loisel, H., Nicolas, J., Deschamps, P., and Frouin, R.: Seasonal and inter-annual variability of particulate organic matter in the global ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(24), 2196, doi:10.1029/2002GL015948, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Loisel, H., Nicholas, J., Sciandra, A., Stramski, D., and Poteau, A.: Spectral dependency of optical backscattering by marine particles from satellite remote sensing of the global ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 111, C09024, doi:10.1029/2005JC003367, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Maritorena, S., Siegel, D A., and Peterson, A R.: Optimization of a semianalytical ocean color model for global-scale applications, Appl. Optics, 41, 2705–2714, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Morel, A. and Maritorena, S.: Bio-optical properties of oceanic waters: a reappraisal, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 7163–7180, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Palmer, J R. and Totterdell, I J.: Production and export in a global ocean ecosystem model, Deep-Sea Res., 48(5), 1169–1198, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Schartau, M. and Oschlies, A.: Simultaneous data-based optimization of a 1D-ecosystem model at three locations in the North Atlantic: Part 1 – Method and parameter estimates, J. Marine Res., 61, 765–793, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Scott, V., Kettle, H., Hankin, R., and Merchant, C J.: Sensitivity analysis of an ocean carbon cycle model: an investigation of parameters affecting \chemCO_2 flux, carbon export and primary production, J. Mar. Res., in review, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Siegel, D., Maritorena, S., Nelson, N., Hansell, D., and Lorenzi-Kayser, M.: Global distribution and dynamics of colored dissolved and detrital organic materials, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 3228, \doidoi:10.1029/2001JC000965, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Smyth, T J., Moore, G F., Hirata, T., and Aiken, J.: Semianalytical model for the derivation of ocean color inherent optical properties: description, implementation, and performance assessment, Appl. Optics, 45(31), 8116–8131, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Stramski, D., Reynolds, R A., Kahru, M., and Mitchell, B G.: Estimation of particulate organic carbon in the ocean from satellite remote sensing, Science, 285, 239–242, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Twardowski, M., Boss, E., Macdonald, J., Pegau, W., Barnard, A., and Zaneveld, J.: A model for estimating bulk refractive index from the optical backscattering ratio and the implications for understanding particle composition in case I and case II waters, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 14 129–14 142, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Ward, B., Friedrichs, M. A. M., Anderson, T., and Osclies, A.: Parameter optimisation techniques and the problem of underdetermination in marine biogeochemical models, J. Marine Syst., in press, 2009. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

