<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.biogeosciences.net/inc/bg/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Biogeosciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.biogeosciences.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1726-4170</issn>
		<eissn>1726-4189</eissn>
		<volume_number>1</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2004</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/bg-1-1-2004</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.biogeosciences.net/1/1/2004/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.biogeosciences.net/1/1/2004/bg-1-1-2004.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.biogeosciences.net/1/1/2004/bg-1-1-2004.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>1</start_page>
	<end_page>9</end_page>
	<publication_date>2004-08-13</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">A field-based method for simultaneous measurements of the &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O and &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C of soil CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; efflux</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>B. Mortazavi</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. L. Prater</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. P. Chanton</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Florida State University, Department of Oceanography, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4320, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Three approaches for determining the stable isotopic composition (&amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C and &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O) of soil CO efflux were compared. A
new technique employed mini-towers, constructed of open-topped piping, that
were placed on the soil surface to collect soil-emitted CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. Samples
were collected along a vertical gradient and analyzed for CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; concentration and isotopic composition. These data were then used to produce
Keeling plots to determine the &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O and &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C of CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; emitted from the soil. These results were then compared to the
&amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O and &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C of soil-respired CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; measured with two other techniques: (1) flux chambers and (2) estimation from the application of the diffusional fractionation factor to measured values of
below ground soil CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and to CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; in equilibrium with soil water &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O. Mini-tower &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O Keeling plots were linear and highly significant (0.81&lt; r &lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; &gt; 0.96), in contrast to chamber &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O Keeling plots, which showed significant curvature,
necessitating the use of a mass balance to calculate the &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O
of respired CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. In the chambers, the values determined for the &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O of soil respired CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; approached the value of CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; in equilibrium with surficial soil water, and the results were significantly &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O enriched relative to the mini-tower results and the &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O of soil CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; efflux determined from soil CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. There were close agreements between the three methods for the determination of the &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C of soil efflux CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. Results suggest that the mini-towers can be effectively used in the field for 
determining the &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O and the &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C of soil-respired CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

